Cited by 421Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsAntibiotic Use and Resistance

The global burden of sepsis: barriers and potential solutions

Open access
Rudd, Kristina E., Kissoon, Niranjan, Limmathurotsakul, Direk, Bory, Sotharith, Mutahunga, Birungi, Seymour, Christopher W., Angus, Derek C., West, T. Eoin·2018·Critical Care

Abstract

Sepsis is a major contributor to the global burden of disease. The majority of sepsis cases and deaths are estimated to occur in low and middle-income countries. Barriers to reducing the global burden of sepsis include difficulty quantifying attributable morbidity and mortality, low awareness, poverty and health inequity, and under-resourced and low-resilience public health and acute health care delivery systems. Important differences in the populations at risk, infecting pathogens, and clinical capacity to manage sepsis in high and low-resource settings necessitate context-specific approaches to this significant problem. We review these challenges and propose strategies to overcome them. These strategies include strengthening health systems, accurately identifying and quantifying sepsis cases, conducting inclusive research, establishing data-driven and context-specific management guidelines, promoting creative clinical interventions, and advocacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13054-018-2157-z

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The persistently high AMR mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa reflects many of the challenges that LMICs broadly face, including fragmented health systems, inadequate ICU facilities, overcrowded ICUs, staff shortages, inadequate universal access to WASH, few trained infection prevention and control personnel, underdeveloped microbiological capacity, and limited access to antibiotics.

    “The persistently high AMR mortality rate in this super-region reflects many of the challenges that LMICs broadly face, which include fragmented health systems, inadequate intensive care units (ICU) facilities, overcrowded ICUs, staff shortages, inadequate universal access to WASH, few trained infection prevention and control personnel, underdeveloped microbiological capacity, and limited access to”

    From Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050 (2024) · cites this paper as [61]

    The sections on critical care capacity, human resources, facilities, and diagnostic capacity describe overcrowded ICUs, staffing shortages, inadequate sanitation, and limited microbiology services in low-resource settings. The antimicrobials section also describes limited access to effective antibiotics in LMICs. But the paper does not establish a persistently high AMR mortality rate in sub-Saharan Africa or attribute that regional rate to these challenges; it also does not specifically document a shortage of trained infection prevention and control personnel. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [49]Review on Antimicrobial Resistance Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rudd, K. E., Kissoon, N., Limmathurotsakul, D., Bory, S., Mutahunga, B., Seymour, C. W., Angus, D. C., & West, T. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Mahidol University (TH)
  • Calmette Hospital (KH)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Rudd, Kristina E.
Venue
Critical Care
Published
2018-09-23
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
232-232
ISSN
1364-8535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891115123
Cited by
416
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 27 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Critical Care (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Collections
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007287)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
sepsis, global burden of disease, low- and middle-income countries, sepsis mortality, health disparities, health system resilience, sepsis management guidelines, sepsis research, health advocacy, sepsis awareness
MeSH terms
Developing Countries, Health Resources, Humans, Global Health, Cost of Illness, Sepsis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review