Cited by 389Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality

Open access
Jawad, Issrah, Lukšić, Ivana, Rafnsson, Snorri Bjorn·2012·Journal of Global Health

Abstract

Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortalityObjective Sepsis is a complex and hard-to-define condition with many different interactions with other disorders.Presently, there are no estimates of the burden of sepsis and septicaemia at the global level and it was not included in the initial Global Burden of Disease study.Non-maternal sepsis has only recently received attention as a substantial global public health problem.The aim of this study was to assess available data on the burden of non-maternal sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock in the community and to identify key gaps in information needed to estimate the global burden of sepsis.Methods Literature review of English language-based studies reporting on the incidence, prevalence, mortality or case-fatality of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.The available literature was searched using the MEDLINE database of citations and abstracts of biomedical research articles published between 1980 and 2008.Findings 8 studies reported incidence of sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock at the national level (4 from the USA and 1 from Brazil, the UK, Norway and Australia).No studies on the incidence, prevalence, mortality or case-fatality from sepsis in developing countries were found.The population sepsis incidence ranged from 22 to 240/100 000 (most plausible estimates ranged from 149 to 240/100 000); of severe sepsis from 13 to 300/100 000 (most of the estimates were between 56 and 91/100 000); and of septic shock 11/100 000.Case-fatality rate depends on the setting and severity of disease.It can reach up to 30% for sepsis, 50% for severe sepsis and 80% for septic shock.While the data were compiled using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a degree of uncertainty still exists regarding the reported estimates. ConclusionThe few national-level reports available allow only a very crude estimation of the incidence of sepsis in developed countries while there is apparent lack of data from developing countries.A clear and universal definition of sepsis as well as the development of a sound epidemiological framework to begin addressing the magnitude of this problem is urgently needed through research in developing countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7189/jogh.01.010404

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hospital-born babies in developing countries have a 3 to 20 times greater risk of neonatal infections because of poor infection-control practices.

    “However, even hospital-born babies in developing countries have a three times greater to 20 times greater risk of neonatal infections because of poor infection-control practices.56, 57, 58, 59”

    From Global burden of childhood pneumonia and diarrhoea (2013) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jawad, I., Lukšić, I., & Rafnsson, S. B.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Venue
Journal of Global Health
Published
2012-06
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
010404-010404
ISSN
  • 2047-2978 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2986
OpenAlex
W4237666362
Cited by
389
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 9
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, global burden of disease, incidence, prevalence, mortality, case fatality rate, data gaps, developing countries, sepsis epidemiology, sepsis definitions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review