The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene duplication and evolution in recurring polyploidization–diploidization cycles in plants
Open accessAbstract
Background: The sharp increase of plant genome and transcriptome data provide valuable resources to investigate evolutionary consequences of gene duplication in a range of taxa, and unravel common principles underlying duplicate gene retention. Results: We survey 141 sequenced plant genomes to elucidate consequences of gene and genome duplication, processes central to the evolution of biodiversity. We develop a pipeline named DupGen_finder to identify different modes of gene duplication in plants. Genes derived from whole-genome, tandem, proximal, transposed, or dispersed duplication differ in abundance, selection pressure, expression divergence, and gene conversion rate among genomes. The number of WGD-derived duplicate genes decreases exponentially with increasing age of duplication events—transposed duplication- and dispersed duplication-derived genes declined in parallel. In contrast, the frequency of tandem and proximal duplications showed no significant decrease over time, providing a continuous supply of variants available for adaptation to continuously changing environments. Moreover, tandem and proximal duplicates experienced stronger selective pressure than genes formed by other modes and evolved toward biased functional roles involved in plant self-defense. The rate of gene conversion among WGD-derived gene pairs declined over time, peaking shortly after polyploidization. To provide a platform for accessing duplicated gene pairs in different plants, we constructed the Plant Duplicate Gene Database. Conclusions: We identify a comprehensive landscape of different modes of gene duplication across the plant kingdom by comparing 141 genomes, which provides a solid foundation for further investigation of the dynamic evolution of duplicate genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M. (2013) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/mst010 · Cited by 46,209
Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P., & Pachter, L. (2016) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3519 · Cited by 9,723
OrthoMCL: Identification of Ortholog Groups for Eukaryotic Genomes
Li, L., Stoeckert, C. J., & Roos, D. S. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1224503 · Cited by 5,707
Self-citationThe genome of the cucumber,Cucumis sativus L
Huang, S., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Li, L., Gu, X., Fan, W., Lucas, W. J., Wang, X., Xie, B., Ni, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.475 · Cited by 1,490
Self-citationA physical, genetic and functional sequence assembly of the barley genome
The International Barley Genome Sequencing Consortium (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11543 · Cited by 1,456
Federhen, S. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1178 · Cited by 1,436
Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations
Gu, Z., Steinmetz, L. M., Gu, X., Scharfe, C., Davis, R. W., & Li, W.-H. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01198 · Cited by 889
Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants
Soltis, P. S., Marchant, D. B., Van de Peer, Y., & Soltis, D. E. (2015) · Current Opinion in Genetics & Development · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.11.003 · Cited by 773
An Archaeopteryx-like theropod from China and the origin of Avialae
Xu, X., You, H., Du, K., & Han, F. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10288 · Cited by 311
Cited by
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726
Metal and metalloid toxicity in plants: an overview on molecular aspects
Angulo-Bejarano, P. I., Puente-Rivera, J., & Cruz-Ortega, R. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10040635 · Cited by 357
Adaptive evolution of the enigmatic Takakia now facing climate change in Tibet
Hu, R., Li, X., Hu, Y., Zhang, R., Lv, Q., Zhang, M., Sheng, X., Zhao, F., Chen, Z., Ding, Y., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.003 · Cited by 55
Differential expansion and retention patterns of LRR‐RLK genes across plant evolution
Kileeg, Z., Haldar, A., Khan, H., Qamar, A., & Mott, G. A. (2023) · Plant Direct · doi:10.1002/pld3.556 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiao, X., Li, Q., Yin, H., Qi, K., Li, L., Wang, R., Zhang, S., & Paterson, A. H.
- Venue
- Genome Biology
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 38-38
- ISSN
- 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-760X
- OpenAlex
- W2943405615
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 70.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
