Cited by 88Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerChromosomal and Genetic Variations

Spatial patterns of CTCF sites define the anatomy of TADs and their boundaries

Open access
Nanni, Luca, Ceri, Stefano, Logie, Colin·2020·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Topologically associating domains (TADs) are genomic regions of self-interaction. Additionally, it is known that TAD boundaries are enriched in CTCF binding sites. In turn, CTCF sites are known to be asymmetric, whereby the convergent configuration of a pair of CTCF sites leads to the formation of a chromatin loop in vivo. However, to date, it has been unclear how to reconcile TAD structure with CTCF-based chromatin loops. Results: We approach this problem by analysing CTCF binding site strengths and classifying clusters of CTCF sites along the genome on the basis of their relative orientation. Analysis of CTCF site orientation classes as a function of their spatial distribution along the human genome reveals that convergent CTCF site clusters are depleted while divergent CTCF clusters are enriched in the 5- to 100-kb range. We then analyse the distribution of CTCF binding sites as a function of TAD boundary conservation across seven primary human blood cell types. This reveals divergent CTCF site enrichment at TAD boundaries. Furthermore, convergent arrays of CTCF sites separate the left and right sections of TADs that harbour internal CTCF sites, resulting in unequal TAD ‘halves’. Conclusions: The orientation-based CTCF binding site cluster classification that we present reconciles TAD boundaries and CTCF site clusters in a mechanistically elegant fashion. This model suggests that the emergent structure of nuclear chromatin in the form of TADs relies on the obligate alternation of divergent and convergent CTCF site clusters that occur at different length scales along the genome. Graphical abstract:

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-020-02108-x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the classic scenario, the boundary is presented by CTCF binding to its sequence motifs located in a divergent orientation at either end of the loop.

    “In the classic scenario, this boundary is presented by CTCF binding to its sequence motifs located in a divergent orientation at either end of the loop [277, 438–440]”

    From Transcriptional enhancers and their communication with gene promoters (2021) · cites this paper as [440]

    The Results section reports that divergent CTCF-site patterns are enriched at TAD boundaries and suggests they confer boundary function (page not provided). But the paper distinguishes boundaries from loop ends: its Results section says loop bases involve pairs of convergent CTCF sites. It therefore does not support placing divergent motifs at either end of a loop. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Atlasi Y Megchelenbrink W Peng T Habibi E Joshi O Wang SY Epigenetic modulation of a hardwired 3D chromatin landscape in two naive states of pluripotency Nat Cell Biol 2019 21 568 578 31036938
  2. [2]Mifsud B Tavares-Cadete F Young AN Sugar R Schoenfelder S Ferreira L Mapping long-range promoter contacts in human cells with high-resolution capture Hi-C Nat Genet 2015 47 598 606 25938943
  3. [4]Wang C Nanni L Novakovic B Megchelenbrink W Kuznetsova T Stunnenberg HG Extensive epigenomic integration of the glucocorticoid response in primary human monocytes and in vitro derived macrophages Sci Rep 2019 9 2772 30809020 PMC6391480
  4. [5]Beagrie RA Scialdone A Schueler M Kraemer DCA Chotalia M Xie SQ Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping Nature. 2017 543 519 524 28273065 PMC5366070
  5. [6]de Wit E de Laat W A decade of 3C technologies: Insights into nuclear organization Genes Dev 2012 26 11 24 22215806 PMC3258961
  6. [8]Lieberman-Aiden E Van Berkum NL Williams L Imakaev M Ragoczy T Telling A Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome Science 2009 326 289 293 19815776 PMC2858594
  7. [10]Dixon JR, Gorkin DU, Ren B. Chromatin Domains: The Unit of Chromosome Organization. Mol Cell. 2016:668–80. PMC5371509 27259200
  8. [11]Dixon JR Selvaraj S Yue F Kim A Li Y Shen Y Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions Nature. 2012 485 376 380 22495300 PMC3356448
  9. [13]Rao SSP Huntley MH Durand NC Stamenova EK Bochkov ID Robinson JT A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping Cell. 2014 159 1665 1680 25497547 PMC5635824
  10. [16]Dorsett D The Many Roles of Cohesin in Drosophila Gene Transcription Trends Genet 2019 35 542 551 31130395 PMC6571051
  11. [19]Parelho V Hadjur S Spivakov M Leleu M Sauer S Gregson HC Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms Cell. 2008 132 422 433 18237772
  12. [21]Remeseiro S Hörnblad A Spitz F Gene regulation during development in the light of topologically associating domains Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 2016 5 169 185 26558551
  13. [28]Schoenfelder S Furlan-Magaril M Mifsud B Tavares-Cadete F Sugar R Javierre BM The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements Genome Res 2015 25 582 597 25752748 PMC4381529
  14. [29]Nichols MH Corces VG A CTCF Code for 3D Genome Architecture Cell. 2015 162 703 705 26276625 PMC4745123
  15. [30]Ong CT Corces VG CTCF: An architectural protein bridging genome topology and function Nat Rev Genet 2014 15 234 246 24614316 PMC4610363
  16. [33]Dunham I Kundaje A Aldred SF Collins PJ Davis CA Doyle F An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome Nature. 2012 489 57 74 22955616 PMC3439153
  17. [34]Kentepozidou E Aitken SJ Feig C Stefflova K Ibarra-Soria X Odom DT Clustered CTCF binding is an evolutionary mechanism to maintain topologically associating domains Genome Biol 2020 21 5 31910870 PMC6945661
  18. [35]Ganji M Shaltiel IA Bisht S Kim E Kalichava A Haering CH Real-time imaging of DNA loop extrusion by condensin Science 2018 360 102 105 29472443 PMC6329450
  19. [38]Jia Z Li J Ge X Wu Y Guo Y Wu Q Tandem CTCF sites function as insulators to balance spatial chromatin contacts and topological enhancer-promoter selection Genome Biol 2020 21 75 32293525 PMC7087399
  20. [39]De Dieuleveult M Yen K Hmitou I Depaux A Boussouar F Dargham DB Genome-wide nucleosome specificity and function of chromatin remodellers in ES cells Nature. 2016 530 113 116 26814966 PMC4871117
  21. [41]Harmston N Ing-Simmons E Tan G Perry M Merkenschlager M Lenhard B Topologically associating domains are ancient features that coincide with Metazoan clusters of extreme noncoding conservation Nat Commun 2017 8 441 28874668 PMC5585340
  22. [42]Crane E Bian Q McCord RP Lajoie BR Wheeler BS Ralston EJ Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation Nature. 2015 523 240 244 26030525 PMC4498965
  23. [43]Cresswell KG Dozmorov MG TADCompare: An R Package for Differential and Temporal Analysis of Topologically Associated Domains Front Genet 2020 11 158 32211023 PMC7076128
  24. [44]Szabo Q, Bantignies F, Cavalli G. Principles of genome folding into topologically associating domains. Sci Adv. 2019;5. PMC6457944 30989119
  25. [45]Racko D Benedetti F Dorier J Stasiak A Transcription-induced supercoiling as the driving force of chromatin loop extrusion during formation of TADs in interphase chromosomes Nucleic Acids Res 2018 46 1648 1660 29140466 PMC5829651
  26. [46]Lengronne A Katou Y Mori S Yokabayashi S Kelly GP Ito T Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription Nature. 2004 430 573 578 15229615 PMC2610358
  27. [47]Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu HG, Mistrot C, Unal E, Koshland DE, et al. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2004;2. PMC490026 15309048
  28. [49]Nuebler J Fudenberg G Imakaev M Abdennur N Mirny LA Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018 115 E6697 E6706 29967174 PMC6055145
  29. [50]Gómez-Marín C Tena JJ Acemel RD López-Mayorga M Naranjo S De La Calle-Mustienes E Evolutionary comparison reveals that diverging CTCF sites are signatures of ancestral topological associating domains borders Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015 112 7542 7547 26034287 PMC4475986
  30. [51]Nanni L Pinoli P Canakoglu A Ceri S PyGMQL: scalable data extraction and analysis for heterogeneous genomic datasets BMC Bioinformatics 2019 20 560 31703553 PMC6842186
  31. [52]Heinz S Benner C Spann N Bertolino E Lin YC Laslo P Simple Combinations of Lineage-Determining Transcription Factors Prime cis-Regulatory Elements Required for Macrophage and B Cell Identities Mol Cell 2010 38 576 589 20513432 PMC2898526
  32. [53]Sandelin A JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles Nucleic Acids Res 2004 32 91D 994 PMC308747 14681366
  33. [54]Quinlan AR BEDTools: The Swiss-Army tool for genome feature analysis Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2014 2014 11.12.1 11.12.34 PMC4213956 25199790
  34. [55]Šubelj L, Bajec M. Unfolding communities in large complex networks: Combining defensive and offensive label propagation for core extraction. Phys Rev E - Stat Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 2011;83. 21517554
  35. [56]Abdennur N Mirny LA Wren J Cooler: Scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays Bioinformatics. 2020 36 311 316 31290943 PMC8205516
  36. [59]Nanni L, Ceri S, Logie C. Spatial patterns of CTCF sites define the anatomy of TADs and their boundaries. GitHub. 2020. https://github.com/lucananni93/CTCF_Spatial_Patterns. PMC7422557 32782014
  37. [60]Nanni L, Ceri S, Logie C. Spatial patterns of CTCF sites define the anatomy of TADs and their boundaries. Zenodo. 2020. 10.5281/zenodo.3930665. PMC7422557 32782014 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nanni, L., Ceri, S., & Logie, C.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Logie, Colin
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
197-197
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W3048801940
Cited by
88
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (693174)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Keywords
topologically associating domains, CTCF binding sites, TAD boundaries, chromatin looping, chromatin structure, 3D genome organization
MeSH terms
CCCTC-Binding Factor, Humans, Genome, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review