Cited by 37Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with advanced cancer (CanACT): study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial

Open access
Low, Joseph, Serfaty, Marc, Davis, Sarah, Vickerstaff, Victoria, Gola, Anna, Omar, Rumana Z., King, Michael, Tookman, Adrian +3 more·2016·Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One-third of people with cancer experience psychological distress and may suppress distressing thoughts, emotions, and concerns, leading to further problems. Conventional psychological treatments reduce distress by problem solving, but in advanced cancer, when ill health is progressive and death may be approaching, physical and psychological difficulties are complex and have no simple solutions. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy encourages acknowledgement and acceptance of mental experiences, increasing people's ability to work with problems that cannot be solved. Previous pilot work in advanced cancer confirms that distress can be associated with an avoidance of experiencing uncomfortable thoughts and emotions. METHODS/DESIGN: This feasibility randomised controlled trial of Acceptance Commitment Therapy aims to establish parameters for a larger trial. Fifty-four participants with advanced cancer will be randomly allocated to up to eight sessions (each 1 hour) of Acceptance Commitment Therapy or a talking control. Participants will be recruited from those attending outpatient services and hospice day care at three specialist palliative care units in North and East London, United Kingdom. The primary outcome is a measure of functioning in four areas of life (physical, social/family, emotional, and general activity) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies--General questionnaire at 3 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes are (i) acceptance using the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire; (ii) psychological distress using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale; (iii) physical functioning using a timed walk and sit-to-stand test; and (iv) quality of life measures including the Euroqol-5 Dimensions and ICECAP Supportive Care measures. Qualitative data will be collected at 3 months to explore the participants' experiences of the trial and therapy. Data will be collected on the costs of care. DISCUSSION: Data generated on the recruitment, retention, and experience of the interventions and the usefulness of the outcome measures will inform the adaptations required and whether changes in function are consistent with existing data when planning for a sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN13841211 (registered 22 July 2015).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-016-1169-8

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT-based internet-interventions are emerging and some positive preliminary results have been published.

    “More recently, ACT-based internet-interventions are emerging and some positive preliminary results have been published (Low et al., 2016; Köhle et al., 2015; Arch and Mitchell, 2016; Mujcic et al., 2018; Köhle et al., 2017).”

    From A guided internet-delivered individually-tailored ACT-influenced cognitive behavioural intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in breast cancer survivors (iNNOVBC): Study protocol (2019) · cites this paper as Low et al., 2016

    The Background reports published ACT studies with useful pilot data in cancer settings and better outcomes in other health-related interventions. It does not identify those interventions as internet-based or report positive preliminary results specifically for internet-delivered ACT. The Interventions section instead describes the planned CanACT sessions as usually face to face. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, J., Serfaty, M., Davis, S., Vickerstaff, V., Gola, A., Omar, R. Z., King, M., Tookman, A., Austen, J. S. J., Turner, K., & Jones, L.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Marie Curie (GB)
Corresponding author
Low, Joseph
Venue
Trials
Published
2016-02-11
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2260058051
Cited by
37
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (PB-PG-1111-26043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, advanced cancer, psychological distress, palliative care, hospice care, acceptance, quality of life, physical function, psychological intervention, trial recruitment and retention, costs of care
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Protocols, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Neoplasms, Patient Selection, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review