Cited by 3Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentPain Management and Opioid Use

An acceptance and commitment therapy-based intervention for opioid use disorder risk in individuals with cancer: A treatment development study

Open access
Yusufov, Miryam, McHugh, R. Kathryn, Greer, Joseph A., Dalrymple, Kristy L., Sannes, Timothy S., Braun, Ilana M., Tulsky, James A., Pirl, William F.·2023·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Abstract

This paper describes the iterative development of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for individuals with cancer at risk for opioid use disorder, using the National Institutes of Health Stage Model for Behavioral Intervention Development. Adult patients with cancer from an outpatient palliative care clinic at an academic cancer center, with moderate to high risk of opioid misuse, were enrolled in a treatment development study that aimed to increase psychological flexibility. In this intervention, psychological flexibility is the posited mechanism of change for reduction of opioid use disorder risk. Patients completed baseline (pre-intervention) assessments, a six-session behavioral intervention based in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, post-intervention assessments, and a semi-structured exit interview. Ten patients with moderate to high risk of opioid misuse completed the intervention. Patients rated the intervention as highly acceptable and were generally highly satisfied. Patients reported finding the coping skills helpful (e.g., mindfulness, cognitive defusion) and reported a preference for more sessions. These treatment development efforts have implications for the development and design of acceptance- and mindfulness-based, targeted interventions for individuals with cancer, receiving palliative care and at risk for opioid use disorder. Specifically, this six-session behavioral intervention to increase psychological flexibility was acceptable to patients and ready to be studied in a pilot RCT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.04.006

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yusufov, M., McHugh, R. K., Greer, J. A., Dalrymple, K. L., Sannes, T. S., Braun, I. M., Tulsky, J. A., & Pirl, W. F.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Yusufov, Miryam
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
28
Pages
226-234
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4366977900
Cited by
3
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (K08CA259538)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, opioid use disorder, cancer patients, opioid misuse risk, psychological flexibility, palliative care, treatment acceptability, mindfulness, coping strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review