Cited by 65Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Vulpes vulpes: A Possible Wild Reservoir for Zoonotic Filariae

Magi, Marta, Calderini, Pietro, Gabrielli, Simona, Dell'Omodarme, Matteo, Macchioni, Fabio, Prati, Maria Cristina, Cancrini, Gabriella·2008·Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Abstract

Foxes ( Vulpes vulpes , n = 132) killed during the hunting seasons 2005–2006 in Central Italy (Tuscany region) were examined in order to investigate the possible importance of this animal as a wild reservoir for zoonotic filariae. In each specimen adult worms of Dirofilaria immitis and hematic microfilariae were searched for. Species identification was performed by morphology, morphometry, the Barka staining technique applied to pulmonary and splenic blood smears, and, finally, by molecular diagnostics—polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing. Twenty-three subjects (17.4%) proved to be positive for filarial parasites. Infection by Acanthocheilonema was more widespread than by Dirofilaria . Briefly, 8 foxes harbored mature adults of D. immitis ; two of them (25%) also had microfilariae that in one case were mixed with the microfilariae of D. repens . Twelve subjects had microfilariae of Acanthocheilonema reconditum , and 3 harbored microfilariae of A. dracunculoides . Molecular diagnostics confirmed all results. Our findings, drawn by the examination of a few microliters of blood obtained from foxes approximately <2 years of age, support the hypothesis that this animal may be an abundant source of infection for ticks that transmit Acanthocheilonema parasites and for mosquitoes that act as vectors for dirofilarial nematodes. Therefore foxes, contributing to the parasite circulation in areas where dogs usually undergo prophylactic treatment, have to be considered an important wild reservoir for filarial parasites that can be transmitted to companion animals and people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/vbz.2007.0207

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wild animals in which Dirofilaria infections were identified were predominantly canids like red foxes, golden jackals, and grey wolves.

    “Furthermore, there are some wild animals in which Dirofilaria infections were identified, predominantly in canids like red foxes [4, 5, 51–62], golden jackals [52–55, 63, 64], and grey wolves [2, 3, 51, 52, 55, 65, 66].”
  • The only comprehensive study on wild carnivores from Italy showed that the red fox can be considered a wild reservoir for zoonotic filarioids.

    “The only comprehensive study on wild carnivores from Italy showed that the red fox can be considered a wild reservoir for zoonotic filarioids (Magi et al., 2008).”
  • In that Italian study, 23 out of 132 specimens (17.4%) proved to be positive for microfilariae.

    “In that study, 23 out of 132 specimens (17.4%) proved to be positive for microfilariae.”
  • Several studies suggest that red foxes are not suitable reservoir hosts for D. immitis or D. repens in some epidemiological settings.

    “Similarly, several studies suggest that red foxes are not suitable reservoir hosts for D. immitis or D. repens in some epidemiological settings [25, 49, 58–60].”
  • Foxes infected with both D. immitis and D. repens in Italy and foxes and jackals infected with D. immitis in Bulgaria have been found.

    “Foxes infected with both D. immitis and D. repens in Italy (247, 254) and foxes and jackals infected with D. immitis in Bulgaria (reviewed in reference 261) have been found.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magi, M., Calderini, P., Gabrielli, S., Dell'Omodarme, M., Macchioni, F., Prati, M. C., & Cancrini, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e Toscana (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Scuola Normale Superiore (IT)
Venue
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
Published
2008-04
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
249-252
ISSN
  • 1530-3667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7759
OpenAlex
W2030404427
Cited by
65
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
red fox, wildlife reservoirs, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, Acanthocheilonema reconditum, microfilariae, canine heartworm disease, Ancylostoma caninum, ticks, mosquitoes, parasite circulation, Tuscany
MeSH terms
Animals, Dirofilaria, Dirofilariasis, Disease Reservoirs, Female, Foxes, Male, Zoonoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review