Cited by 73Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Diagnostic value of serum versus plasma phospho-tau for Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Kac, Przemysław R., Gonzalez-Ortiz, Fernando, Simrén, Joel, Dewit, Nele, Vanmechelen, Eugeen, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Ashton, Nicholas J. +1 more·2022·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

Background: Blood phosphorylated tau (p-tau) forms are promising Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers, but validation in matrices other than ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma is limited. Firstly, we assessed the diagnostic potential of p-tau231 and p-tau181 in paired plasma and serum samples. Secondly, we compared serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from biomarker-positive AD and biomarker-negative control participants. Methods: We studied three independent cohorts ( n =115 total): cohorts 1 and 2 included individuals with paired plasma and serum, while cohort 3 included paired serum and CSF. Blood-based p-tau231 and p-tau181 were measured using in-house or commercial single molecule array (Simoa) methods. Results: Serum and plasma p-tau231 and p-tau181 were two- to three-fold increased in biomarker-positive AD versus biomarker-negative controls ( P ≤0.0008). Serum p-tau231 separated diagnostic groups with area under the curve (AUC) of 82.2% (cohort 3) to 88.2% (cohort 1) compared with 90.2% (cohort 1) for plasma. Similarly, p-tau181 showed AUC of 89.6% (cohort 1) to 89.8% (cohort 3) in serum versus 85.4% in plasma (cohort 1). P-tau231 and p-tau181 correlated slightly better in serum (rho=0.92 for cohort 1, 0.93 for cohort 3) than in plasma (rho=0.88, cohort 1). Within-individual p-tau181 (Quanterix) and p-tau231 concentrations were twice higher in plasma versus serum, but p-tau181 (in-house, Gothenburg) levels were not statistically different. Bland-Altman plots revealed that the relative difference between serum/plasma was larger in the lower range. P-tau levels in paired plasma and serum correlated strongly with each other (rho=0.75–0.93) as well as with CSF Aβ 42 (rho= −0.56 to −0.59), p-tau and total-tau (rho=0.53–0.73). Based on the results, it seems possible that serum p-tau reflects the same pool of brain-secreted p-tau as in CSF; we estimated that less than 2% of CSF p-tau is found in serum, being same for both controls and AD. Conclusions: Comparable diagnostic performances and strong correlations between serum versus plasma pairs suggest that p-tau analyses can be expanded to research cohorts and hospital systems that prefer serum to other blood matrices. However, absolute biomarker concentrations may not be interchangeable, indicating that plasma and serum samples should be used independently. These results should be validated in independent cohorts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-022-01011-w

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent large study comparing plasma to CSF tau showed comparable areas under the curve (approaching 90%) for each phospho-tau assay, with plasma values largely paralleling CSF values in distinguishing biomarker-positive AD.

    “In fact, a recent large study comparing plasma to cerebrospinal fluid tau showed that there were comparable areas under the curve (approaching 90%) for each of the phospho-tau assays measured; plasma values largely paralleled cerebrospinal fluid values (87) in distinguishing individuals with biomarker-positive AD.”

    From All the Tau We Cannot See (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kac, P. R., Gonzalez-Ortiz, F., Simrén, J., Dewit, N., Vanmechelen, E., Zetterberg, H., Blennow, K., Ashton, N. J., & Karikari, T. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • ADx NeuroSciences (BE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Karikari, Thomas K.
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2022-05-11
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
65-65
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280534580
Cited by
73
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
University of Gothenburg
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, phosphorylated tau, p-tau231, p-tau181, serum biomarkers, plasma biomarkers, cerebrospinal fluid, blood-based biomarkers, diagnostic accuracy, amyloid-beta 42, Simoa, biomarker validation, total tau, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Phosphorylation, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review