Cited by 17Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Hippocampus-centred grey matter covariance networks predict the development and reversion of mild cognitive impairment

Open access
Dang, Mingxi, Yang, Caishui, Chen, Kewei, Lu, Peng, Li, He, Zhang, Zhanjun, for the Beijing Aging Brain Rejuvenation Initiative, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·2023·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been thought of as the transitional stage between normal ageing and Alzheimer’s disease, involving substantial changes in brain grey matter structures. As most previous studies have focused on single regions (e.g. the hippocampus) and their changes during MCI development and reversion, the relationship between grey matter covariance among distributed brain regions and clinical development and reversion of MCI remains unclear. Methods: With samples from two independent studies (155 from the Beijing Aging Brain Rejuvenation Initiative and 286 from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), grey matter covariance of default, frontoparietal, and hippocampal networks were identified by seed-based partial least square analyses, and random forest models were applied to predict the progression from normal cognition to MCI (N-t-M) and the reversion from MCI to normal cognition (M-t-N). Results: With varying degrees, the grey matter covariance in the three networks could predict N-t-M progression (AUC = 0.692–0.792) and M-t-N reversion (AUC = 0.701–0.809). Further analyses indicated that the hippocampus has emerged as an important region in reversion prediction within all three brain networks, and even though the hippocampus itself could predict the clinical reversion of M-t-N, the grey matter covariance showed higher prediction accuracy for early progression of N-t-M. Conclusions: Our findings are the first to report grey matter covariance changes in MCI development and reversion and highlight the necessity of including grey matter covariance changes along with hippocampal degeneration in the early detection of MCI and Alzheimer’s disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-023-01167-z

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating tau PET, FDG-PET, and amyloid-β achieved maximal performance (0.95 accuracy; representing a 7-14% improvement).

    “integrating all three biomarkers achieved maximal performance (0.95 accuracy; representing a 7–14% improvement)”

    From Multimodal neuroimaging and AI integration in cognitive disorders: advances, challenges, and future directions for precision medicine (2026) · cites this paper as Dang et al., 2023

    The Methods section describes using baseline T1-weighted MRI, and Table 3 in the Results reports AUCs for grey-matter covariance networks. Searches for tau PET, FDG-PET, amyloid-β, and the stated performance figures found no passage reporting a three-biomarker model with 0.95 accuracy or a 7–14% improvement. Our copy does not address the attributed result. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [26]Dicks E Tijms BM Kate MT Gouw AA Flier W Gray matter network measures are associated with cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment Neurobiol Aging 2017 61 198 29111486
  2. [34]Krishnan A Williams LJ McIntosh AR Abdi H Partial least squares (PLS) methods for neuroimaging: a tutorial and review Neuroimage. 2011 56 2 455 475 20656037

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dang, M., Yang, C., Chen, K., Lu, P., Li, H., Zhang, Z., & for the Beijing Aging Brain Rejuvenation Initiative, F. T. A. D. N. I.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Banner Alzheimer’s Institute (US)
  • China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Zhanjun
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2023-02-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
27-27
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319030137
Cited by
16
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M700485)
  • State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (82130118)
  • Funds for International Cooperation and Exchange of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81820108034)
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81625025)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, hippocampus, default mode network, frontoparietal network, Alzheimer's disease, early detection, brain network connectivity
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cognitive Dysfunction, Gray Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review