The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of immunomodulation by macrophage subsets on osteogenesis in vitro
Open accessAbstract
Background: Bone formation and remodeling are influenced by the inflammatory state of the local microenvironment. In this regard, macrophages are postulated to play a crucial role in modulating osteogenesis. However, the differential effects of macrophage subsets and their plasticity on bone formation are currently unknown. Methods: Polarized primary murine macrophages and preosteoblastic MC3T3 cells were co-cultured to investigate the effect of non-activated M0, pro-inflammatory M1, and tissue-regenerative M2 macrophages on the osteogenic ability of MC3T3-E1 cells in vitro. Furthermore, to model the physiological transition from inflammation to tissue regeneration, M1-MC3T3 co-cultures were treated with interleukin-4 (IL-4) at different time points to modulate the M1 phenotype towards M2. Macrophage phenotypic markers were assessed by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A time course study of osteogenic markers at different time points was conducted: alkaline phosphatase (ALP) mRNA levels were evaluated at week 1, ALP activity and osteocalcin and osteopontin mRNA levels at week 2, and matrix mineralization and osteocalcin and osteopontin protein concentrations at week 3. Supernatant collected 72 hours after seeding or IL-4 treatment, whichever was later, was analyzed for oncostatin M, a cytokine released by macrophages that has been recognized to enhance osteogenesis. Unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s or Dunnett’s post hoc tests were used for statistical comparison of the groups. Results: Co-culture with any of the macrophage subtypes increased the osteogenic ability of MC3T3 cells as indicated by increases in ALP activity and matrix mineralization. Increased ALP activity, osteocalcin concentration, and matrix mineralization demonstrated that osteogenesis by M1-MC3T3 co-cultures was further enhanced by macrophage phenotype modulation to M2 via IL-4 treatment 72 hours after seeding. Increased oncostatin M protein concentration in untreated M1-MC3T3 co-cultures and M1-MC3T3 co-cultures treated with IL-4 at 72 hours correlated with greater ALP activity and matrix mineralization. Conclusions: These results suggest that a transient inflammatory phase is crucial for enhanced bone formation. Macrophage plasticity may offer new strategies for modulating the local inflammatory microenvironment with the aim of potentially enhancing bone repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization
MANTOVANI, A., SICA, A., SOZZANI, S., ALLAVENA, P., VECCHI, A., & LOCATI, M. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015 · Cited by 6,534
Alternative activation of macrophages
Gordon, S. (2003) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri978 · Cited by 6,189
Osteoimmunology: shared mechanisms and crosstalk between the immune and bone systems
Takayanagi, H. (2007) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2062 · Cited by 1,878
Brown, B. N., Ratner, B. D., Goodman, S. B., Amar, S., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.034 · Cited by 926 · cited 1×
“neous and plastic [9], are broadly described as nonac-”
Self-citationSpiller, K. L., Nassiri, S., Witherel, C. E., Anfang, R. R., Ng, J., Nakazawa, K. R., Yu, T., & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. (2015) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.017 · Cited by 773
Macrophages modulate the viability and growth of human mesenchymal stem cells
Freytes, D. O., Kang, J. W., Marcos‐Campos, I., & Vunjak‐Novakovic, G. (2013) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.24357 · Cited by 255 · cited 1×
“Despite an increasing number of studies confirming the anabolic effect of macrophages on bone formation, a consensus has not been reached on which macrophage phenotype is most beneficial for bone regeneration [14–18].”
Menzies, F. M., Henriquez, F. L., Alexander, J., & Roberts, C. W. (2010) · Clinical and Experimental Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.04086.x · Cited by 90
Cited by
Interaction between bone and immune cells: Implications for postmenopausal osteoporosis
Fischer, V., & Haffner-Luntzer, M. (2022) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.05.014 · Cited by 759
Modulation of the Inflammatory Response and Bone Healing
Maruyama, M., Rhee, C., Utsunomiya, T., Zhang, N., Ueno, M., Yao, Z., & Goodman, S. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2020.00386 · Cited by 541
Self-citationZhu, G., Zhang, T., Chen, M., Yao, K., Huang, X., Zhang, B., Li, Y., Liu, J., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Z. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.03.043 · Cited by 494
Current Advances in Immunomodulatory Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Lee, J., Byun, H., Madhurakkat Perikamana, S. K., Lee, S., & Shin, H. (2019) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201801106 · Cited by 452
Macrophage Polarization and Osteoporosis: A Review
Muñoz, J., Akhavan, N. S., Mullins, A. P., & Arjmandi, B. H. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12102999 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Loi, F., Córdova, L. A., Zhang, R., Pajarinen, J., Lin, T.-H., Goodman, S. B., & Yao, Z.
- Venue
- Stem Cell Research & Therapy
- Published
- 2016-01-22
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-15
- ISSN
- 1757-6512 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2291429897
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of immunomodulation by macrophage subsets on osteogenesis in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13287-016-0276-5
- The paper
- Loi, F., Córdova, L. A., Zhang, R., Pajarinen, J., Lin, T.-H., Goodman, S. B., & Yao, Z. (2016). The effects of immunomodulation by macrophage subsets on osteogenesis in vitro. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0276-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.