Cited by 4Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Transcriptomic analysis of stem cells from chorionic villi uncovers the impact of chromosomes 2, 6 and 22 in the clinical manifestations of Down syndrome

Open access
Vaiasicca, Salvatore, Melone, Gianmarco, James, David W., Quintela, Marcos, Preziuso, Alessandra, Finnell, Richard H., Conlan, Robert Steven, Francis, Lewis W. +1 more·2023·Stem Cell Research & Therapy

Abstract

Background: Down syndrome (DS) clinical multisystem condition is generally considered the result of a genetic imbalance generated by the extra copy of chromosome 21. Recent discoveries, however, demonstrate that the molecular mechanisms activated in DS compared to euploid individuals are more complex than previously thought. Here, we utilize mesenchymal stem cells from chorionic villi (CV) to uncover the role of comprehensive functional genomics-based understanding of DS complexity. Methods: Next-generation sequencing coupled with bioinformatic analysis was performed on CV obtained from women carrying fetuses with DS (DS-CV) to reveal specific genome-wide transcriptional changes compared to their euploid counterparts. Functional assays were carried out to confirm the biological processes identified as enriched in DS-CV compared to CV (i.e., cell cycle, proliferation features, immunosuppression and ROS production). Results: Genes located on chromosomes other than the canonical 21 (Ch. 2, 6 and 22) are responsible for the impairment of life-essential pathways, including cell cycle regulation, innate immune response and reaction to external stimuli were found to be differentially expressed in DS-CV. Experimental validation confirmed the key role of the biological pathways regulated by those genes in the etiology of such a multisystem condition. Conclusions: NGS dataset generated in this study highlights the compromised functionality in the proliferative rate and in the innate response of DS-associated clinical conditions and identifies DS-CV as suitable tools for the development of specifically tailored, personalized intervention modalities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13287-023-03503-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 70

  1. [1]Antonarakis SE Lyle R Dermitzakis ET Reymond A Deutsch S Chromosome 21 and Down syndrome: from genomics to pathophysiology Nat Rev Genet 2004 5 10 725 738 10.1038/nrg1448 15510164 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Antonarakis SE 10 years of genomics, chromosome 21, and Down syndrome Genomics 1998 51 1 1 16 10.1006/geno.1998.5335 9693027 · DOI
  3. [3]Lejeune J Gauthier M Turpin R Human chromosomes in tissue cultures C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 1959 248 4 602 603 13629913
  4. [4]Ross JA Spector LG Robison LL Olshan AF Epidemiology of leukemia in children with Down syndrome Pediatr Blood Cancer 2005 44 1 8 12 10.1002/pbc.20165 15390275 · DOI
  5. [5]Liu B Filippi S Roy A Roberts I Stem and progenitor cell dysfunction in human trisomies EMBO Rep 2015 16 1 44 62 10.15252/embr.201439583 25520324 PMC4304728 · DOI
  6. [6]Silva CR Biselli-Perico JM Zampieri BL Silva WA Jr de Souza JE Burger MC Differential expression of inflammation-related genes in children with Down syndrome Mediators Inflamm 2016 2016 6985903 10.1155/2016/6985903 27293319 PMC4879265 · DOI
  7. [7]Antonarakis SE Epstein CJ The challenge of Down syndrome Trends Mol Med 2006 12 10 473 479 10.1016/j.molmed.2006.08.005 16935027 · DOI
  8. [9]Granese B Scala I Spatuzza C Valentino A Coletta M Vacca RA Validation of microarray data in human lymphoblasts shows a role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and NF-kB in the pathogenesis of Down syndrome BMC Med Genomics 2013 5 6 24 10.1186/1755-8794-6-24 PMC3717290 23830204 · DOI
  9. [10]Potier MC Rivals I Mercier G Ettwiller L Moldrich RX Laffaire J Transcriptional disruptions in Down syndrome: a case study in the Ts1Cje mouse cerebellum during post-natal development J Neurochem 2006 97 Suppl 1 104 109 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03624.x 16635258 · DOI
  10. [12]Pelleri MC Cattani C Vitale L Antonaros F Strippoli P Locatelli C Integrated quantitative transcriptome maps of human trisomy 21 tissues and cells Front Genet 2018 9 125 10.3389/fgene.2018.00125 29740474 PMC5928158 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [13]Roper RJ Reeves RH Understanding the basis for Down syndrome phenotypes PLoS Genet 2006 2 3 e50 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020050 16596169 PMC1420680 · DOI
  12. [14]Antonaros F Zenatelli R Guerri G Bertelli M Locatelli C Vione B The transcriptome profile of human trisomy 21 blood cells Hum Genomics 2021 15 1 25 10.1186/s40246-021-00325-4 33933170 PMC8088681 · DOI
  13. [15]Kong XD Liu N Xu XJ Bioinformatics analysis of biomarkers and transcriptional factor motifs in Down syndrome Braz J Med Biol Res 2014 47 10 834 841 10.1590/1414-431X20143792 25118625 PMC4181218 · DOI
  14. [16]You SH Lee YS Chang YJ Lin CY Wang TH Chang YL Gene expression profiling of amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells of monozygotic twins discordant for trisomy 21 Gene 2020 15 738 144461 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144461 32057927 · DOI
  15. [17]Brigida AL Siniscalco D Induced pluripotent stem cells as a cellular model for studying Down syndrome J Stem Cells Regen Med 2016 12 2 54 60 10.46582/jsrm.1202009 28096629 PMC5227104 · DOI
  16. [18]Parolini O Alviano F Bagnara GP Bilic G Buhring HJ Evangelista M Concise review: isolation and characterization of cells from human term placenta: outcome of the first international Workshop on Placenta Derived Stem Cells Stem Cells 2008 26 2 300 311 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0594 17975221 · DOI
  17. [20]Kim D Paggi JM Park C Bennett C Salzberg SL Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype Nat Biotechnol 2019 37 8 907 915 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 31375807 PMC7605509 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [21]Love MI Huber W Anders S Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 Genome Biol 2014 15 12 550 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 25516281 PMC4302049 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [22]Abraham A Pedregosa F Eickenberg M Gervais P Mueller A Kossaifi J Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn Front Neuroinform 2014 8 14 10.3389/fninf.2014.00014 24600388 PMC3930868 · DOI
  20. [23]Walter W Sanchez-Cabo F Ricote M GOplot: an R package for visually combining expression data with functional analysis Bioinformatics 2015 31 17 2912 2914 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv300 25964631 · DOI
  21. [25]Liao Y Wang J Jaehnig EJ Shi Z Zhang B WebGestalt 2019: gene set analysis toolkit with revamped UIs and APIs Nucleic Acids Res 2019 47 W1 W199 W205 10.1093/nar/gkz401 31114916 PMC6602449 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [26]Jassal B Matthews L Viteri G Gong C Lorente P Fabregat A The reactome pathway knowledgebase Nucleic Acids Res 2020 48 D1 D498 D503 31691815 PMC7145712
  23. [27]Kanehisa M Sato Y Kawashima M Furumichi M Tanabe M KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation Nucleic Acids Res 2016 44 D1 D457 D462 10.1093/nar/gkv1070 26476454 PMC4702792 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [28]Doncheva NT Morris JH Gorodkin J Jensen LJ Cytoscape StringApp: network analysis and visualization of proteomics data J Proteome Res 2019 18 2 623 632 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00702 30450911 PMC6800166 · DOI
  25. [29]The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D325–34. PMC7779012 33290552
  26. [30]Szklarczyk D Gable AL Lyon D Junge A Wyder S Huerta-Cepas J STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets Nucleic Acids Res 2019 47 D1 D607 D613 10.1093/nar/gky1131 30476243 PMC6323986 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [31]Ogata H Goto S Sato K Fujibuchi W Bono H Kanehisa M KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes Nucleic Acids Res 1999 27 1 29 34 10.1093/nar/27.1.29 9847135 PMC148090 · DOI · Paper page
  28. [32]Dominici M Le Blanc K Mueller I Slaper-Cortenbach I Marini F Krause D Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement Cytotherapy 2006 8 4 315 317 10.1080/14653240600855905 16923606 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [33]Bull MJ Down syndrome N Engl J Med 2020 382 24 2344 2352 10.1056/NEJMra1706537 32521135 · DOI
  30. [34]Ashburner M Ball CA Blake JA Botstein D Butler H Cherry JM Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium Nat Genet 2000 25 1 25 29 10.1038/75556 10802651 PMC3037419 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [35]Gillespie M Jassal B Stephan R Milacic M Rothfels K Senff-Ribeiro A The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022 Nucleic Acids Res 2022 50 D1 D687 D692 10.1093/nar/gkab1028 34788843 PMC8689983 · DOI
  32. [36]FitzPatrick DR Ramsay J McGill NI Shade M Carothers AD Hastie ND Transcriptome analysis of human autosomal trisomy Hum Mol Genet 2002 11 26 3249 3256 10.1093/hmg/11.26.3249 12471051 · DOI
  33. [37]Letourneau A Santoni FA Bonilla X Sailani MR Gonzalez D Kind J Domains of genome-wide gene expression dysregulation in Down’s syndrome Nature 2014 508 7496 345 350 10.1038/nature13200 24740065 · DOI · Paper page
  34. [38]Ahlfors H Anyanwu N Pakanavicius E Dinischiotu N Lana-Elola E Watson-Scales S Gene expression dysregulation domains are not a specific feature of Down syndrome Nat Commun 2019 10 1 2489 10.1038/s41467-019-10129-9 31171815 PMC6554309 · DOI
  35. [41]Wilcock DM Griffin WS Down’s syndrome, neuroinflammation, and Alzheimer neuropathogenesis J Neuroinflammation 2013 16 10 84 PMC3750399 23866266
  36. [42]Desai SS Down syndrome: a review of the literature Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997 84 3 279 285 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90343-7 9377191 · DOI
  37. [43]Rachidi M Lopes C Mental retardation in Down syndrome: from gene dosage imbalance to molecular and cellular mechanisms Neurosci Res 2007 59 4 349 369 10.1016/j.neures.2007.08.007 17897742 · DOI
  38. [44]Fukai T Ushio-Fukai M Superoxide dismutases: role in redox signaling, vascular function, and diseases Antioxid Redox Signal 2011 15 6 1583 1606 10.1089/ars.2011.3999 21473702 PMC3151424 · DOI
  39. [45]Lee M Hyun D Jenner P Halliwell B Effect of overexpression of wild-type and mutant Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutases on oxidative damage and antioxidant defences: relevance to Down’s syndrome and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis J Neurochem 2001 76 4 957 965 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00107.x 11181815 · DOI
  40. [46]Roat E Prada N Ferraresi R Giovenzana C Nasi M Troiano L Mitochondrial alterations and tendency to apoptosis in peripheral blood cells from children with Down syndrome FEBS Lett 2007 581 3 521 525 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.12.058 17250829 · DOI
  41. [47]Valenti D Manente GA Moro L Marra E Vacca RA Deficit of complex I activity in human skin fibroblasts with chromosome 21 trisomy and overproduction of reactive oxygen species by mitochondria: involvement of the cAMP/PKA signalling pathway Biochem J 2011 435 3 679 688 10.1042/BJ20101908 21338338 · DOI
  42. [48]Cheon MS Dierssen M Kim SH Lubec G Protein expression of BACE1, BACE2 and APP in Down syndrome brains Amino Acids 2008 35 2 339 343 10.1007/s00726-007-0618-9 18163181 · DOI
  43. [49]Wilkins HM Swerdlow RH Amyloid precursor protein processing and bioenergetics Brain Res Bull 2017 133 71 79 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.08.009 27545490 PMC5316384 · DOI
  44. [50]Jiang Y Mullaney KA Peterhoff CM Che S Schmidt SD Boyer-Boiteau A Alzheimer’s-related endosome dysfunction in Down syndrome is Abeta-independent but requires APP and is reversed by BACE-1 inhibition Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 107 4 1630 1635 10.1073/pnas.0908953107 20080541 PMC2824382 · DOI
  45. [51]Kessal K Liang H Rabut G Daull P Garrigue JS Docquier M Conjunctival inflammatory gene expression profiling in dry eye disease: correlations With HLA-DRA and HLA-DRB1 Front Immunol 2018 9 2271 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02271 30374345 PMC6196257 · DOI
  46. [52]Park SK Dahmer MK Quasney MW MAPK and JAK-STAT signaling pathways are involved in the oxidative stress-induced decrease in expression of surfactant protein genes Cell Physiol Biochem 2012 30 2 334 346 10.1159/000339068 22739240 · DOI
  47. [53]Campoli M Ferrone S HLA antigen changes in malignant cells: epigenetic mechanisms and biologic significance Oncogene 2008 27 45 5869 5885 10.1038/onc.2008.273 18836468 PMC2729106 · DOI
  48. [54]Leite FA Lira RC Fedatto PF Antonini SR Martinelli CE Jr de Castro M Low expression of HLA-DRA, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DPB1 is associated with poor prognosis in pediatric adrenocortical tumors (ACT) Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014 61 11 1940 1948 10.1002/pbc.25118 25156210 · DOI
  49. [55]Meissner M Konig V Hrgovic I Valesky E Kaufmann R Human leucocyte antigen class I and class II antigen expression in malignant fibrous histiocytoma, fibrosarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is significantly downregulated J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010 24 11 1326 1332 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03644.x 20337820 · DOI
  50. [56]Rimsza LM Roberts RA Miller TP Unger JM LeBlanc M Braziel RM Loss of MHC class II gene and protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is related to decreased tumor immunosurveillance and poor patient survival regardless of other prognostic factors: a follow-up study from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project Blood 2004 103 11 4251 4258 10.1182/blood-2003-07-2365 14976040 · DOI
  51. [57]Aitken RJ Mehers KL Williams AJ Brown J Bingley PJ Holl RW Early-onset, coexisting autoimmunity and decreased HLA-mediated susceptibility are the characteristics of diabetes in Down syndrome Diabetes Care 2013 36 5 1181 1185 10.2337/dc12-1712 23275362 PMC3631858 · DOI
  52. [58]Parssinen J Alarmo EL Khan S Karhu R Vihinen M Kallioniemi A Identification of differentially expressed genes after PPM1D silencing in breast cancer Cancer Lett 2008 259 1 61 70 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.09.019 17977650 · DOI
  53. [59]Wang W Wang Q Wan D Sun Y Wang L Chen H Histone HIST1H1C/H1.2 regulates autophagy in the development of diabetic retinopathy Autophagy 2017 13 5 941 954 10.1080/15548627.2017.1293768 28409999 PMC5446066 · DOI
  54. [60]Wang L Yang B Jiang H Yu G Feng M Lu X The molecular mechanism study of insulin in promoting wound healing under high-glucose conditions J Cell Biochem 2019 120 9 16244 16253 10.1002/jcb.28905 31081255 · DOI
  55. [61]Carroll CW Silva MC Godek KM Jansen LE Straight AF Centromere assembly requires the direct recognition of CENP-A nucleosomes by CENP-N Nat Cell Biol 2009 11 7 896 902 10.1038/ncb1899 19543270 PMC2704923 · DOI
  56. [62]Hori T Okada M Maenaka K Fukagawa T CENP-O class proteins form a stable complex and are required for proper kinetochore function Mol Biol Cell 2008 19 3 843 854 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0556 18094054 PMC2262965 · DOI
  57. [63]Logarinho E Bousbaa H Kinetochore-microtubule interactions “in check” by Bub1, Bub3 and BubR1: the dual task of attaching and signalling Cell Cycle 2008 7 12 1763 1768 10.4161/cc.7.12.6180 18594200 · DOI
  58. [64]Kim T Gartner A Bub1 kinase in the regulation of mitosis Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 2021 25 1 1 10 10.1080/19768354.2021.1884599 33717411 PMC7935115 · DOI
  59. [65]Xie B Wang S Jiang N Li JJ Cyclin B1/CDK1-regulated mitochondrial bioenergetics in cell cycle progression and tumor resistance Cancer Lett 2019 28 443 56 66 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.11.019 PMC6759061 30481564 · DOI
  60. [66]Fu Y Lv Z Kong D Fan Y Dong B High abundance of CDC45 inhibits cell proliferation through elevation of HSPA6 Cell Prolif 2022 55 7 e13257 10.1111/cpr.13257 35642733 PMC9251052 · DOI
  61. [67]Rosner M Kowalska A Freilinger A Prusa AR Marton E Hengstschlager M Cell cycle and cell size regulation in Down syndrome cells J Neural Transm Suppl 2003 67 51 58 10.1007/978-3-7091-6721-2_4 15068238 · DOI
  62. [68]Gao ZW Dong K Zhang HZ The roles of CD73 in cancer Biomed Res Int 2014 2014 460654 10.1155/2014/460654 25126561 PMC4121992 · DOI
  63. [69]Minor M Alcedo KP Battaglia RA Snider NT Cell type- and tissue-specific functions of ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2019 317 6 C1079 C1092 10.1152/ajpcell.00285.2019 31461341 PMC6957383 · DOI
  64. [70]Allard B Longhi MS Robson SC Stagg J The ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73: novel checkpoint inhibitor targets Immunol Rev 2017 276 1 121 144 10.1111/imr.12528 28258700 PMC5338647 · DOI · Paper page
  65. [71]Barile L Vassalli G Exosomes: therapy delivery tools and biomarkers of diseases Pharmacol Ther 2017 174 63 78 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.02.020 28202367 · DOI
  66. [72]Abusamra AJ Zhong Z Zheng X Li M Ichim TE Chin JL Tumor exosomes expressing Fas ligand mediate CD8+ T-cell apoptosis Blood Cells Mol Dis 2005 35 2 169 173 10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.07.001 16081306 · DOI
  67. [73]Yu S Liu C Su K Wang J Liu Y Zhang L Tumor exosomes inhibit differentiation of bone marrow dendritic cells J Immunol 2007 178 11 6867 6875 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.6867 17513735 · DOI · Paper page
  68. [74]Gauthier SA Perez-Gonzalez R Sharma A Huang FK Alldred MJ Pawlik M Enhanced exosome secretion in Down syndrome brain—a protective mechanism to alleviate neuronal endosomal abnormalities Acta Neuropathol Commun 2017 5 1 65 10.1186/s40478-017-0466-0 28851452 PMC5576289 · DOI
  69. [75]Zhang K Kaufman RJ From endoplasmic-reticulum stress to the inflammatory response Nature 2008 454 7203 455 462 10.1038/nature07203 18650916 PMC2727659 · DOI · Paper page
  70. [76]Hotamisligil GS Inflammation and metabolic disorders Nature 2006 444 7121 860 867 10.1038/nature05485 17167474 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaiasicca, S., Melone, G., James, D. W., Quintela, M., Preziuso, A., Finnell, R. H., Conlan, R. S., Francis, L. W., & Corradetti, B.
Affiliations
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
Corresponding author
Corradetti, Bruna
Venue
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
Published
2023-09-23
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
265-265
ISSN
1757-6512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386979665
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stem Cell Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Cronfa (Swansea University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020)
  • Houston Methodist Research Institute
  • European Regional Development Fund
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (HORIZON2020)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
Down syndrome, chorionic villi, mesenchymal stem cells, transcriptome, chromosome 2, chromosome 6, chromosome 22, cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, innate immune response, immunosuppression, reactive oxygen species, gene expression profiling, personalized medicine
MeSH terms
Chorionic Villi, Chromosomes, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Stem Cells, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review