The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture
Open accessAbstract
More than one hundred years have passed since the development of the first microbial inoculant for plants. Nowadays, the use of microbial inoculants in agriculture is spread worldwide for different crops and carrying different microorganisms. In the last decades, impressive progress has been achieved in the production, commercialization and use of inoculants. Nowadays, farmers are more receptive to the use of inoculants mainly because high-quality products and multi-purpose elite strains are available at the market, improving yields at low cost in comparison to chemical fertilizers. In the context of a more sustainable agriculture, microbial inoculants also help to mitigate environmental impacts caused by agrochemicals. Challenges rely on the production of microbial inoculants for a broader range of crops, and the expansion of the inoculated area worldwide, in addition to the search for innovative microbial solutions in areas subjected to increasing episodes of environmental stresses. In this review, we explore the world market for inoculants, showing which bacteria are prominent as inoculants in different countries, and we discuss the main research strategies that might contribute to improve the use of microbial inoculants in agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
The Evolution and Future of Earth’s Nitrogen Cycle
Canfield, D. E., Glazer, A. N., & Falkowski, P. G. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1186120 · Cited by 2,697
Fukami, J., Ollero, F. J., Megías, M., & Hungria, M. (2017) · AMB Express · doi:10.1186/s13568-017-0453-7 · Cited by 211
Silalertruksa, T., & Gheewala, S. H. (2020) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-019-01664-0 · Cited by 55
Cited by
Peng, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5 · Cited by 333
Inoculated microbial consortia perform better than single strains in living soil: A meta-analysis
Liu, X., Mei, S., & Salles, J. F. (2023) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105011 · Cited by 236
Ribeiro, V. P., Gomes, E. A., de Sousa, S. M., de Paula Lana, U. G., Coelho, A. M., Marriel, I. E., & de Oliveira-Paiva, C. A. (2022) · Archives of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s00203-022-02759-3 · Cited by 60
Metabolic Engineering for Large‐Scale Environmental Bioremediation
Nikel, P. I., & de Lorenzo, V. (2021) · Metabolic Engineering · doi:10.1002/9783527823468.ch22 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, M. S., Nogueira, M. A., & Hungria, M.
- Venue
- AMB Express
- Published
- 2019-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-205
- ISSN
- 2191-0855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2994946937
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13568-019-0932-0
- The paper
- Santos, M. S., Nogueira, M. A., & Hungria, M. (2019). Microbial inoculants: reviewing the past, discussing the present and previewing an outstanding future for the use of beneficial bacteria in agriculture. AMB Express. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-019-0932-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.