The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application
Open accessAbstract
Feed efficiency represents the cumulative efficiency with which the pig utilizes dietary nutrients for maintenance, lean gain and lipid accretion. It is closely linked with energy metabolism, as the oxidation of carbon-containing components in the feed drive all metabolic processes. While much is known about nutrient utilization and tissue metabolism, blending these subjects into a discussion on feed efficiency has proven to be difficult. For example, while increasing dietary energy concentration will almost certainly increase feed efficiency, the correlation between dietary energy concentration and feed efficiency is surprisingly low. This is likely due to the plethora of non-dietary factors that impact feed efficiency, such as the environment and health as well as individual variation in maintenance requirements, body composition and body weight. Nonetheless, a deeper understanding of feed efficiency is critical at many levels. To individual farms, it impacts profitability. To the pork industry, it represents its competitive position against other protein sources. To food economists, it means less demand on global feed resources. There are environmental and other societal implications as well. Interestingly, feed efficiency is not always reported simply as a ratio of body weight gain to feed consumed. This review will explain why this arithmetic calculation, as simple as it initially seems, and as universally applied as it is in science and commerce, can often be misleading due to errors inherent in recording of both weight gain and feed intake. This review discusses the importance of feed efficiency, the manner in which it can be measured and reported, its basis in biology and approaches to its improvement. It concludes with a summary of findings and recommendations for future efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eighth revised edition, 1979
(1979) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/19882 · Cited by 4,196
Nutrient Requirements of Swine: Eleventh Revised Edition
(2012) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/13298 · Cited by 3,293
Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle
Koch, R. M., Swiger, L. A., Chambers, D., & Gregory, K. E. (1963) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1963.222486x · Cited by 1,298
Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis1
Noblet, J., & Perez, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1993.71123389x · Cited by 437
Wondra, K. J., Hancock, J. D., Behnke, K. C., Hines, R. H., & Stark, C. R. (1995) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1995.733757x · Cited by 349
Jørgensen, H., Zhao, X.-Q., & Eggum, B. O. (1996) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19960140 · Cited by 341
Renaudeau, D., Gourdine, J. L., & St-Pierre, N. R. (2011) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2010-3329 · Cited by 258
Towards a functional explanation for the occurrence of anorexia during parasitic infections
KYRIAZAKIS, I., TOLKAMP, B. J., & HUTCHINGS, M. R. (1998) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0761 · Cited by 250
Noblet, J., Karege, C., Dubois, S., & van Milgen, J. (1999) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1999.7751208x · Cited by 248
Gilbert, H., Bidanel, J.-P., Gruand, J., Caritez, J.-C., Billon, Y., Guillouet, P., Lagant, H., Noblet, J., & Sellier, P. (2007) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2006-590 · Cited by 243
Cited by
Li, F., & Guan, L. L. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00061-17 · Cited by 346
Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine
Bergamaschi, M., Tiezzi, F., Howard, J., Huang, Y. J., Gray, K. A., Schillebeeckx, C., McNulty, N. P., & Maltecca, C. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9 · Cited by 258
Brito, L. F., Oliveira, H. R., Houlahan, K., Fonseca, P. A. S., Lam, S., Butty, A. M., Seymour, D. J., Vargas, G., Chud, T. C. S., Silva, F. F., et al. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2019-0193 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Patience, J. F., Rossoni-Serão, M. C., & Gutiérrez, N. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2015-08-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-33
- ISSN
- 1674-9782 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-1891
- OpenAlex
- W1939842549
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 22.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40104-015-0031-2
- The paper
- Patience, J. F., Rossoni-Serão, M. C., & Gutiérrez, N. A. (2015). A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0031-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.