The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle
Open accessAbstract
Exploring compositional and functional characteristics of the rumen microbiome can improve the understanding of its role in rumen function and cattle feed efficiency. In this study, we applied metatranscriptomics to characterize the active rumen microbiomes of beef cattle with different feed efficiencies (efficient, n = 10; inefficient, n = 10) using total RNA sequencing. Active bacterial and archaeal compositions were estimated based on 16S rRNAs, and active microbial metabolic functions including carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) were assessed based on mRNAs from the same metatranscriptomic data sets. In total, six bacterial phyla ( Proteobacteria , Firmicutes , Bacteroidetes , Spirochaetes , Cyanobacteria , and Synergistetes ), eight bacterial families ( Succinivibrionaceae , Prevotellaceae , Ruminococcaceae , Lachnospiraceae , Veillonellaceae , Spirochaetaceae , Dethiosulfovibrionaceae , and Mogibacteriaceae ), four archaeal clades ( Methanomassiliicoccales , Methanobrevibacter ruminantium , Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii , and Methanosphaera ), 112 metabolic pathways, and 126 CAZymes were identified as core components of the active rumen microbiome. As determined by comparative analysis, three bacterial families ( Lachnospiraceae , Lactobacillaceae , and Veillonellaceae ) tended to be more abundant in low-feed-efficiency (inefficient) animals ( P < 0.10), and one archaeal taxon ( Methanomassiliicoccales ) tended to be more abundant in high-feed-efficiency (efficient) cattle ( P < 0.10). Meanwhile, 32 microbial metabolic pathways and 12 CAZymes were differentially abundant (linear discriminant analysis score of >2 with a P value of <0.05) between two groups. Among them, 30 metabolic pathways and 11 CAZymes were more abundant in the rumen of inefficient cattle, while 2 metabolic pathways and 1 CAZyme were more abundant in efficient animals. These findings suggest that the rumen microbiomes of inefficient cattle have more diverse activities than those of efficient cattle, which may be related to the host feed efficiency variation. IMPORTANCE This study applied total RNA-based metatranscriptomics and showed the linkage between the active rumen microbiome and feed efficiency (residual feed intake) in beef cattle. The data generated from the current study provide fundamental information on active rumen microbiome at both compositional and functional levels, which serve as a foundation to study rumen function and its role in cattle feed efficiency. The findings that the active rumen microbiome may contribute to variations in feed efficiency of beef cattle highlight the possibility of enhancing nutrient utilization and improve cattle feed efficiency through modification of rumen microbial functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Li, H., Handsaker, B., Wysoker, A., Fennell, T., Ruan, J., Homer, N., Marth, G., Abecasis, G., Durbin, R., & 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · Cited by 62,041
Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2
Langmead, B., & Salzberg, S. L. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1923 · Cited by 56,400
Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction
Chomczynski, P., & Sacchi, N. (1987) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2 · Cited by 46,426
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST
Edgar, R. C. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · Cited by 20,826
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549
Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
Segata, N., Izard, J., Waldron, L., Gevers, D., Miropolsky, L., Garrett, W. S., & Huttenhower, C. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 · Cited by 16,192
Kim, D., Pertea, G., Trapnell, C., Pimentel, H., Kelley, R., & Salzberg, S. L. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 · Cited by 12,668
Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB
DeSantis, T. Z., Hugenholtz, P., Larsen, N., Rojas, M., Brodie, E. L., Keller, K., Huber, T., Dalevi, D., Hu, P., & Andersen, G. L. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.03006-05 · Cited by 10,891
Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update
Wheeler, D. L. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh073 · Cited by 10,641
The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013
Lombard, V., Golaconda Ramulu, H., Drula, E., Coutinho, P. M., & Henrissat, B. (2014) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1178 · Cited by 6,333
Cited by
Li, F., Li, C., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, C., Irving, B., Fitzsimmons, C., Plastow, G., & Guan, L. L. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0699-1 · Cited by 530
“the associations between rumen microorganisms and feed efficiency [2, 3].”
BackgroundHuws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161 · Cited by 487
Self-citationMatthews, C., Crispie, F., Lewis, E., Reid, M., O’Toole, P. W., & Cotter, P. D. (2019) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2018.1505176 · Cited by 459
Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production
Terry, S. A., Basarab, J. A., Guan, L. L., & McAllister, T. A. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1139/cjas-2020-0022 · Cited by 142
“Other genera associated with efficient cattle include Coprococcus (Zhou et al. 2018), whereas Butyrivibrio, Anaerovibrio (Myer et al. 2015), and Lachnospiraceae, Lactobacillaceae and Veillonellaceae have been associated with less efficient cattle (Li and Guan 2017).”
BackgroundEdwards, J. E., Forster, R. J., Callaghan, T. M., Dollhofer, V., Dagar, S. S., Cheng, Y., Chang, J., Kittelmann, S., Fliegerova, K., Puniya, A. K., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01657 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, F., & Guan, L. L.
- Venue
- Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 0099-2240 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-5336
- OpenAlex
- W2591278429
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 42.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/aem.00061-17
- The paper
- Li, F., & Guan, L. L. (2017). Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active Rumen Microbiome and Feed Efficiency in Beef Cattle. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00061-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.