The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle
Abstract
Feed efficiency measured as a function of gain in body weight and feed consumed was studied for 1,324 bull and heifer calves at three experiment stations. Three measures were computed: (1) feed consumption adjusted for differences in gain; (2) gain adjusted for differences in feed consumption; and (3) the ratio of gain to feed consumed. In all three measures, mid-weight was considered simultaneously in an attempt to remove differences in maintenance requirements. Efficiency expressed as gain adjusted for differences in feed consumption (i.e., ±deviation from the regression of gain on consumption) was considered the most accurate mathematical description of the cause and effect relationships and resulted in the highest heritability of the three measures studied. No trends in the heritabilities calculated for each experiment station were noted. The combined heritabilities were 0.65 for gain on test, 0.64 for feed consumed, 0.62 for gain adjusted for differences in feed consumption, 0.28 for feed consumption adjusted for differences in gain, and 0.36 for the ratio of gain to feed consumed. A path analysis of feed efficiency (gain adjusted for feed consumption), feed consumption and gain was made. The analysis indicated that 38% of the variation in gain could be attributed directly to genetic differences in feed efficiency. Genetic differences in feed consumption accounted for 25% of the variation in gain. The remaining 37% of the variation in gain was accounted for by variations in environmental influences. The genetic correlation between feed efficiency and gain was 0.79, between feed consumption and gain was 0.64, and between feed efficiency and feed consumption was 0.04. These results indicate that selecting for gain should be effective and lead to both increased feed efficiency and increased feed consumption. Selecting for feed efficiency would increase feed efficiency and result in increased daily gain, but feed consumption would not be affected. Selection for feed consumption would increase feed consumption and daily gain, but would lead to no improvement in feed efficiency other than that attributable to a smaller portion of the intake being used for body maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brody, S., & Lardy, H. A. (1946) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j150446a008 · Cited by 3,459
Estimation of Variance and Covariance Components
Henderson, C. R. (1953) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001853 · Cited by 1,311
Pearson, K. (1897) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rspl.1896.0076 · Cited by 1,130
Fallacy of Per-Weight and Per-Surface Area Standards, and Their Relation to Spurious Correlation
Tanner, J. M. (1949) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1949.2.1.1 · Cited by 519
Heritability of Growth and Efficiency in Beef Cattle
Knapp, B. W., & NORDSKOG, A. W. (1946) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1946.5162 · Cited by 40
Cited by
Specific microbiome-dependent mechanisms underlie the energy harvest efficiency of ruminants.
Shabat, S. K. B., Sasson, G., Doron-Faigenboim, A., Durman, T., Yaacoby, S., Berg Miller, M. E., White, B. A., Shterzer, N., & Mizrahi, I. (2016) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2016.62 · Cited by 823
Potential role of the bovine rumen microbiome in modulating milk composition and feed efficiency
Jami, E., White, B. A., & Mizrahi, I. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0085423 · Cited by 588
A review of feed efficiency in swine: biology and application
Patience, J. F., Rossoni-Serão, M. C., & Gutiérrez, N. A. (2015) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-015-0031-2 · Cited by 395
CELL BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle1
Berry, D. P., & Crowley, J. J. (2013) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5862 · Cited by 377
Li, F., & Guan, L. L. (2017) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00061-17 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, R. M., Swiger, L. A., Chambers, D., & Gregory, K. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1963-05-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 486-494
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W71047797
- Cited by
- 1,298
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas1963.222486x
- The paper
- Koch, R. M., Swiger, L. A., Chambers, D., & Gregory, K. E. (1963). Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1963.222486x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.