CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 236Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The contribution of culturomics to the repertoire of isolated human bacterial and archaeal species

Open access
Bilen, Melhem, Dufour, Jean-Charles, Lagier, Jean-Christophe, Cadoret, Fréderic, Daoud, Ziad, Dubourg, Grégory, Raoult, Didier·2018·Microbiome
DOI 10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5PMC PMC5966928
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

After a decade of research and metagenomic analyses, our knowledge of the human microbiota appears to have reached a plateau despite promising results. In many studies, culture has proven to be essential in describing new prokaryotic species and filling metagenomic gaps. In 2015, only 2172 different prokaryotic species were reported to have been isolated at least once from the human body as pathogens or commensals. In this review, we update the previous repertoire by reporting the different species isolated from the human body to date, increasing it by 28% to reach a total of 2776 species associated with human beings. They have been classified into 11 different phyla, mostly the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. Finally, culturomics contributed up to 66.2% towards updating this repertoire by reporting 400 species, of which 288 were novel. This demonstrates the need to continue the culturing work, which seems essential in order to decipher the hidden human microbial content.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 All 2776 species isolated at least once from humans by culture. Using the online tool wordle (www.wordle.net), the size of the name of each species is proportional to the number of times it occurs in the repertoire
Fig. 1 All 2776 species isolated at least once from humans by culture. Using the online tool wordle (www.wordle.net), the size of the name of each species is proportional to the number of times it occurs in the repertoireCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Distribution of bacterial species reported in this repertoire according to their phylum, based on the NCBI taxonomy classification with the highest category being clustered in the Firmicutes phylum. Cyanobacteria, Deferribacteres, Spirochaetes, Synergistetes, and Tenericutes represent minority phyla in this repertoire, with 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, and 3 different species, respectively
Fig. 2 Distribution of bacterial species reported in this repertoire according to their phylum, based on the NCBI taxonomy classification with the highest category being clustered in the Firmicutes phylum. Cyanobacteria, Deferribacteres, Spirochaetes, Synergistetes, and Tenericutes represent minority phyla in this repertoire, with 1, 1, 1, 3, 3, and 3 different species, respectivelyCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 All 2776 species isolated at least once from humans using culture. Using the online tool wordle (www.wordle.net), the size of the name of each species is proportional to the number of times it occurs in the database. In this image, only the species name was taken into consideration, excluding the genus
Fig. 3 All 2776 species isolated at least once from humans using culture. Using the online tool wordle (www.wordle.net), the size of the name of each species is proportional to the number of times it occurs in the database. In this image, only the species name was taken into consideration, excluding the genusCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Distribution of bacterial species isolated from the gut using culturomics, according to the phylum to which they belong, based on the NCBI taxonomy classification, with the highest clustering in the Firmicutes phylum
Fig. 4 Distribution of bacterial species isolated from the gut using culturomics, according to the phylum to which they belong, based on the NCBI taxonomy classification, with the highest clustering in the Firmicutes phylumCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Number of reported species isolated for the first time in humans by culturomics using the new species announcement format compared to the full description format
Fig. 5 Number of reported species isolated for the first time in humans by culturomics using the new species announcement format compared to the full description formatCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Show all 90 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 236

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Bilen, M., Dufour, J.-C., Lagier, J.-C., Cadoret, F., Daoud, Z., Dubourg, G., & Raoult, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Balamand (LB)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
  • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille (FR)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Raoult, Didier
ORCID
Venue
Microbiome
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
94-94
ISSN
2049-2618 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s40168-018-0485-5
PMC
PMC5966928
OpenAlex
W2807527107
Cited by
231
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 10
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Microbiome (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
IHU Méditerranée Infection
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Microbiology (medical) › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
culturomics, human microbiota, new species, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, actinobacteria
MeSH terms
Firmicutes, Bacillota, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Archaea, Bacteria, DNA, Bacterial, Humans, DNA, Archaeal, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Metagenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review