Cited by 13Cancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Prevalence of adjustment disorder among cancer patients, and the reach, effectiveness, cost-utility and budget impact of tailored psychological treatment: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
van Beek, Florie E., Wijnhoven, Lonneke M. A., Jansen, Femke, Custers, José A. E., Aukema, Eline J., Coupé, Veerle M. H., Cuijpers, Pim, van der Lee, Marije L. +4 more·2019·BMC Psychology

Abstract

Background: Information on the prevalence of adjustment disorders among cancer patients and the value of psychological interventions in this group of patients is limited. This study investigates the prevalence of adjustment disorders among cancer patients as well as the reach, effectiveness, cost-utility and budget impact of a tailored psychological intervention. Method: This study consists of two parts. Part 1 is an observational study among a representative group of mixed cancer patients after cancer treatment on the prevalence of adjustment disorder as well as the uptake (i.e. reach) of psychological treatment. In Part 2, patients diagnosed with an adjustment disorder are invited to participate in a randomized controlled trial. Patients will be randomized to the intervention (access to the tailored psychological intervention) or control group (waitlist period of 6 months). The psychological intervention consists of three modules: one module containing psycho-education (3 sessions, all patients) and two additional modules (maximum of 6 sessions per module) provided as continuum, in case needed. Module 2 and 3 can consist of several evidence-based interventions (e.g. group interventions, mindfulness, eHealth) The primary outcome is psychological distress (HADS). Secondary outcomes are mental adjustment to cancer (MAC) and health-related quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30). To assess the cost-utility and budget impact, quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) and costs (iMCQ and iPCQ) will be measured. Measures will be completed at baseline and 3 and 6-months after randomization. Discussion: This study will provide data of the prevalence of adjustment disorders and the reach, effectiveness, cost-utility and budget impact of a tailored psychological intervention. Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register identifier:NL7763. Registered on 3 June 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40359-019-0368-y

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the study had to stop recruiting patients earlier than planned, resulting in 200 patients with breast, prostate, and head and neck cancer instead of the planned 3000 patients with various types of cancer.

    “A limitation is that, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we had to stop recruiting patients earlier than planned, which resulted in 200 patients with breast, prostate, and head and neck cancer instead of the planned 3000 patients with various types of cancer [14].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]Vercoulen JHMM, Alberets M, Blijenberg G. De checklist individual strength (CIS). Gedragstherapie. 1999;32:31–6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Beek, F. E., Wijnhoven, L. M. A., Jansen, F., Custers, J. A. E., Aukema, E. J., Coupé, V. M. H., Cuijpers, P., van der Lee, M. L., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Wijnen, B., Prins, J. B., & Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Trimbos Institute (NL)
Venue
BMC Psychology
Published
2019-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
89-89
ISSN
2050-7283 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996349402
Cited by
13
References
59
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (856001005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
adjustment disorder, cancer patients, psychological intervention, prevalence, psychological distress, mental adjustment to cancer, health-related quality of life, cost-utility analysis, budget impact, psychoeducation, mindfulness, e-health, group intervention
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Adult, Clinical Protocols, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Netherlands, Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Research Design, Prevalence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Mindfulness, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review