Cited by 92Mental Health and PsychiatryPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychology and Mental Health

Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood

Open access
Baumeister, Harald, Maercker, Andreas, Casey, Patricia·2009·Psychopathology

Abstract

Background: The volume of research involving adjustment disorder (AD) is limited. The scientific neglect of AD seems to result from the inadequate operationalisation of AD in DSM-IV and ICD-10. The aims of the present proposal are to discuss the shortcomings of AD conceptualisations and to present recommendations for the future. Sampling and Methods: This conceptual paper is based on an iterative process of debate between the authors. Results: The current operational definition of AD is characterised by 3 main limitations: (1) the inadequately defined clinical significance criterion, (2) the relegation of AD behind other diagnoses and (3) the missed recognition of the importance of contextual factors, such that normal human adaptive processes might be pathologised. Furthermore, subtypes of AD lack operational clarity. Based on a discussion of the limitations, recommendations for DSM-V are presented, including the addition of new subtypes. Conclusions: The revision of AD criteria will reduce the likelihood of false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. These changes will enable the scientific exploration of this common and relevant disorder, and will make epidemiological studies, and ultimately service planning based on these, more reliable than at present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000207455

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adjustment disorder has been a recognised diagnosis in the ICD since 1978 and in the DSM since 1980.

    “adjustment disorder has been a recognised diagnosis in the ICD since 1978 2 and in the DSM since 1980. 3”

    From Adjustment disorder: Implications for ICD-11 and DSM-5 (2012) · cites this paper as [2]

    Table 1 (section labelled Conclusion; page unavailable) lists adjustment-disorder criteria in both DSM-IV and ICD-10, supporting its recognition in both systems. The paper passages found do not establish that recognition began in the ICD in 1978 or the DSM in 1980; searches for both dates returned no such history. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The diagnosis of adjustment disorder may be prone to a psychologist's individual interpretation because strict diagnostic criteria for adjustment disorder in the DSM-V are lacking.

    “Another explanation may be the absence of clear criteria to diagnose AD, as strict diagnostic criteria for AD in the DSM-V are lacking [21]. As a consequence, the diagnosis of AD may be prone to a psychologist’s individual interpretation of the criteria.”

    From Adjustment disorder in cancer patients after treatment: prevalence and acceptance of psychological treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Abstract and Recommendations for DSM-V (page not available) describe adjustment-disorder criteria as inadequately defined and call for clearer criteria, supporting the general concern about diagnostic ambiguity. But the paper critiques DSM-IV and ICD-10 and proposes changes for DSM-V; it does not establish that strict criteria are lacking in DSM-V. Its discussion of clinical versus standardised diagnoses suggests room for interpretation, but does not specifically assess psychologists’ individual interpretations. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Der fehlende Zusammenhang zwischen höherem Schulabschluss und Inanspruchnahme zeigt sich auch in verschiedenen früheren Studien, während in anderen Studien höhere Bildung mit höherer Inanspruchnahme einherging.

    “Dies zeigt sich auch in verschiedenen früheren Studien [ 32 , 33 , 55 ] , während in anderen Studien höhere Bildung mit höherer Inanspruchnahme einherging [ 31 , 53 ] .”

    From Inanspruchnahmebereitschaft und Inanspruchnahmeverhalten von Behandlungen aufgrund psychischer Belastungen bei Patienten der somatischen Rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [32]

    The passages on treatment-seeking (Criterion B; page unavailable) and service use (Criterion C; page unavailable) do not relate either to educational attainment. Searches for education, school qualifications, and healthcare utilisation found no passage in our copy addressing whether higher education is associated with service use. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Kaplan HI: Comprehensive Textbook of Psy- c h i at r y, e d 2 . B a lt i more , W i l l i a m s & W i l k i n s , 1975. 10 Brown WA: Treatment response in melan- cholia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007; 115: 125- 129.
  2. Fabrega HJ, Mezzich J: Adjustment disorder and psychiatric practice: cultural and histor- ical aspects. Psychiatry 1987; 50: 31-49.
  3. Baumeister H, Morar V: The impact of clini- ca l signif icance criteria on sub-t hreshold de- pression prevalence rates. Acta Psychiatrica Scand, in press.
  4. Prigerson HG, Horowitz MJ, Jacobs SC, Parkes CM, Aslan M, Raphael B, Marwit SJ, Wortman C, Goodkin K, Neimeyer RA, Bonanno G, Block SD, Kissane D, Boelen P, Maercker A, Litz B, Johnson JG, First MB, Maciejewski PK: Field trial of consensus cri- teria for prolonged grief disorder proposed for DSM-V. PLoS Med, in press. 39
  5. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, Nelson CB, Hughes M, Eshleman S, Wittchen HU, Kendler KS: Lifetime and 12-month preva- lence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994; 51: 8-19.
  6. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikan- gas KR, Walters EE: Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders i n t he Nat iona l Comorbid it y Su r vey Replica- tion. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 617-627.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumeister, H., Maercker, A., & Casey, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Psychopathology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
139-147
ISSN
  • 0254-4962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-033X
OpenAlex
W2026577555
Cited by
92
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
96.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
adjustment disorder, depressive mood, diagnostic criteria, DSM-V, ICD-10, operational definitions, contextual factors, diagnostic subtypes, DSM-IV
MeSH terms
Adjustment Disorders, Depression, Forecasting, Humans, Guidelines as Topic, International Classification of Diseases, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review