Cited by 1613D Surveying and Cultural HeritageCultural Heritage Management and PreservationArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

Digitalizing cultural heritage through metaverse applications: Challenges, opportunities, and strategies

Open access
Buragohain, Dipima, Meng, Yahui, Deng, Chaoqun, Li, Qirui, Chaudhary, Sushank·2024·Heritage Science

Abstract

Abstract Preservation and accessibility of cultural heritage have become essential with the rapid advancements of globalization and modernization endeavors constantly threatening historical artifacts and sites across the world. The advent of the metaverse, with its immersive and interactive capabilities, presents a novel approach to safeguarding and promoting cultural heritage. The current study aims to explore the potential of metaverse applications in digitalizing cultural heritage, encompassing virtual reconstructions, educational outreach, global accessibility, and sustainability. It conducts a systematic literature review using PRISMA guidelines to collect, screen, and evaluate existing research enquiries into investigating current practices and technologies in the digitalization of heritage preservation. The study also conducts case study research to investigate the challenges and opportunities associated with the virtual preservation of tangible and intangible cultural assets, including issues of authenticity, representation, and sustainability. Furthermore, it evaluates the impact of metaverse applications on public engagement and cultural education. The findings provide valuable insights into developing innovative strategies for preserving cultural heritage in the digital age while highlighting best practices and guidelines for optimizing metaverse applications in cultural heritage preservation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s40494-024-01403-1

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some cutting-edge virtual museums are including meta-commentary on their own reconstruction process (e.g., showing what data is missing, or showing alternate reconstructions).

    “Some cutting-edge virtual museums are indeed doing this by including meta-commentary on their own reconstruction process (e.g., showing what data is missing, or showing alternate reconstructions) [10,36,38,49].”

    From Virtual Museums as Meaning-Modeling Systems in Digital Heritage (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Methods and materials passages discuss incomplete data and the risk of inaccurate virtual reconstructions, but do not say that virtual museums show visitors missing data, alternative reconstructions, or commentary on how reconstructions were made. Searches for those practices found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buragohain, D., Meng, Y., Deng, C., Li, Q., & Chaudhary, S.
Affiliations
Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology (CN)
Venue
Heritage Science
Published
2024-08-13
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2050-7445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401544115
Cited by
161
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 5
FWCI
63.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heritage Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
metaverse, cultural heritage digitization, virtual reconstruction, intangible cultural heritage, authenticity, representation, sustainability, citizen participation, cultural education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review