The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent developments in time-of-flight PET
Open accessAbstract
While the first time-of-flight (TOF)-positron emission tomography (PET) systems were already built in the early 1980s, limited clinical studies were acquired on these scanners. PET was still a research tool, and the available TOF-PET systems were experimental. Due to a combination of low stopping power and limited spatial resolution (caused by limited light output of the scintillators), these systems could not compete with bismuth germanate (BGO)-based PET scanners. Developments on TOF system were limited for about a decade but started again around 2000. The combination of fast photomultipliers, scintillators with high density, modern electronics, and faster computing power for image reconstruction have made it possible to introduce this principle in clinical TOF-PET systems. This paper reviews recent developments in system design, image reconstruction, corrections, and the potential in new applications for TOF-PET. After explaining the basic principles of time-of-flight, the difficulties in detector technology and electronics to obtain a good and stable timing resolution are shortly explained. The available clinical systems and prototypes under development are described in detail. The development of this type of PET scanner also requires modified image reconstruction with accurate modeling and correction methods. The additional dimension introduced by the time difference motivates a shift from sinogram- to listmode-based reconstruction. This reconstruction is however rather slow and therefore rebinning techniques specific for TOF data have been proposed. The main motivation for TOF-PET remains the large potential for image quality improvement and more accurate quantification for a given number of counts. The gain is related to the ratio of object size and spatial extent of the TOF kernel and is therefore particularly relevant for heavy patients, where image quality degrades significantly due to increased attenuation (low counts) and high scatter fractions. The original calculations for the gain were based on analytical methods. Recent publications for iterative reconstruction have shown that it is difficult to quantify TOF gain into one factor. The gain depends on the measured distribution, the location within the object, and the count rate. In a clinical situation, the gain can be used to either increase the standardized uptake value (SUV) or reduce the image acquisition time or administered dose. The localized nature of the TOF kernel makes it possible to utilize local tomography reconstruction or to separate emission from transmission data. The introduction of TOF also improves the joint estimation of transmission and emission images from emission data only. TOF is also interesting for new applications of PET-like isotopes with low branching ratio for positron fraction. The local nature also reduces the need for fine angular sampling, which makes TOF interesting for limited angle situations like breast PET and online dose imaging in proton or hadron therapy. The aim of this review is to introduce the reader in an educational way into the topic of TOF-PET and to give an overview of the benefits and new opportunities in using this additional information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Update on time-of-flight PET imaging
Surti, S. (2015) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.114.145029 · Cited by 303
Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection
Kadrmas, D. J., Casey, M. E., Conti, M., Jakoby, B. W., Lois, C., & Townsend, D. W. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.109.063016 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Performance Evaluation of the Vereos PET/CT System According to the NEMA NU2-2012 Standard
Rausch, I., Ruiz, A., Valverde-Pascual, I., Cal-González, J., Beyer, T., & Carrio, I. (2019) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.118.215541 · Cited by 168
Performance evaluation of the next generation solid-state digital photon counting PET/CT system
Zhang, J., Maniawski, P., & Knopp, M. V. (2018) · EJNMMI Research · doi:10.1186/s13550-018-0448-7 · Cited by 123
Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging advances in the 21st century
Vaz, S. C., Oliveira, F., Herrmann, K., & Veit-Haibach, P. (2020) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20200095 · Cited by 86
Reduction of 18 F-FDG Dose in Clinical PET/MR Imaging by Using Silicon Photomultiplier Detectors
Sekine, T., Delso, G., Zeimpekis, K. G., de Galiza Barbosa, F., ter Voert, E. E. G. W., Huellner, M., & Veit-Haibach, P. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162305 · Cited by 79
Schug, D., Nadig, V., Weissler, B., Gebhardt, P., & Schulz, V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/trpms.2018.2884564 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandenberghe, S., Mikhaylova, E., D’Hoe, E., Mollet, P., & Karp, J. S.
- Venue
- EJNMMI Physics
- Published
- 2016-02-16
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-3
- ISSN
- 2197-7364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2281211957
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent developments in time-of-flight PET. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s40658-016-0138-3
- The paper
- Vandenberghe, S., Mikhaylova, E., D’Hoe, E., Mollet, P., & Karp, J. S. (2016). Recent developments in time-of-flight PET. EJNMMI Physics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-016-0138-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.