Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Taking social media to a university classroom: teaching and learning using Twitter and blogs

Open access
Chawinga, Winner Dominic·2017·International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0041-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Social media has taken many sectors including the higher education by storm. However, with wide spread fears that social media may be a distractor to pedagogy, this paper investigated how social media facilitates teaching and learning. Unlike most prior studies which relied much on soliciting mere views from students and lecturers about their intentions to use or not to use social media, this study incorporated Twitter and blogs into two undergraduate courses offered in the Department of Library and Information Science at Mzuzu University which is a public university in Malawi. Data were collected in two ways: first, analysis of blog and Twitter posts by students and second, a questionnaire was sent to 64 students to find out their perception towards the use of blogs and Twitter in a classroom environment. Results suggest that if appropriately deployed, Twitter and blogs are catalysts for the much hyped learner-centred approach to teaching because using these technologies, it emerged that students shared and discussed course materials, posted their course reflections and interacted amongst themselves and with their lecturer 24/7. Challenges faced include cost of internet data bundles, inaccessible Wi-Fi, poor bandwidths and insufficient computers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41239-017-0041-6

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71–80. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barczyk, C. C., & Duncan, D. G. (2011). Social networking media as a tool for teaching business administration courses. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(17), 267–276.
  3. Browning, L., Gerlich, R. N., & Westermann, L. (2011). The new HD classroom: a hyper diverse approach to engaging with students. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1–15.
  4. Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100–107.
  5. Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2015). Lecturers’ use of Web 2.0 in the Faculty of Information Science and Communications at Mzuzu University, Malawi. Mousaion: South African Journal of Information Studies, 33(4), 62–85.
  6. Chawinga, W. D., & Zinn, S. (2016). Use of Web 2.0 by students in the Faculty of Information Science and Communications at Mzuzu University, Malawi. South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v18i1.694 . Accessed 20 March 2016. · DOI
  7. Conole, G. (2010). Review of Pedagogical Models and their use in e-learning. Milton Keynes: Open University.
  8. Conole, G., & Alevizou, P. (2010). A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in Higher Education. In A report commissioned by the Higher Education Academy. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
  9. De Wever, B., Hämäläinen, R., Voet, M., & Gielen, M. (2015). A wiki task for first-year university students: The effect of scripting students’ collaboration. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 37–44. · DOI
  10. Deng, L., & Yuen, A. H. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers & education, 56(2), 441–451. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Dzvapatsva, G. P., Mitrovic, Z., & Dietrich, A. D. (2014). Use of social media platforms for improving academic performance at Further Education and Training Colleges. South African Journal of Information Management, 16(1). · DOI
  12. Farkas, M. (2012). Participatory technologies, pedagogy 2.0 and information literacy. Library Hi Tech, 30(1), 82–94. · DOI
  13. Galagan, P. (2010). Burp, chatter, tweet: New sounds in the classroom. T + D, 64(7), 26–29.
  14. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones and social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Harris, A. L., & Rea, A. (2009). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: a growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137–144.
  16. Jacquemin, S. J., Smelser, L. K., & Bernot, M. J. (2014). Twitter in the higher education classroom: a student and faculty assessment of use and perception. Journal of College Science Teaching, 43(6), 2–9. · DOI
  17. Jones, A. (2015). How Twitter saved my literature class: a case study with discussion. In C. Wankel, M. Marovich, K. Miller, & J. Stanaityte (Eds.), Teaching Arts and Science with the New Social Media (pp. 91–105). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  18. Kim, I., & Kuljis, J. (2010). Applying content analysis to Web based content. In: Proceedings of Information Technology Interfaces (ITI), 2010 32nd International Conference (pp. 283–288), June 21–24, 2010: Cavtat, Croatia. · DOI
  19. Maloney, E. (2007). What Web 2.0 can teach us about learning. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 25(18), B26.
  20. Mason, R. (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121–133. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Menkhoff, T., Chay, Y. W., Bengtsson, M L., Woodard, C. J., & Gan, B. (2014). Incorporating microblogging (“tweeting”) in higher education: lessons learnt in a Knowledge Management Course. Computers in Human Behavior. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321400681 . Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
  22. Roblyer, M. D., McDaniel, M., Webb, M., Herman, J., & Witty, J. V. (2010). Findings on Facebook in higher education: a comparison of college faculty and student uses and perceptions of social networking sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(3), 134–140. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Schroeder, J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (2009). The chemistry of Facebook: using social networking to create an online community for the organic chemistry laboratory. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(4), 1–7.
  24. Soares, D. A. (2008). Understanding class blogs as a tool for language development. Language Teaching Research, 12(4), 517–533. · DOI
  25. Szapkiw, A., & Szapkiw, M. (2011). Engaging higher education students through tweeting. In S. Barton, J. Hedberg, & K. Suzuki (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific (pp. 360–364). Melbourne: Global Learn Asia Pacific.
  26. Terrell, J., Richardson, J., & Hamilton, M. (2011). Using Web 2.0 to teach Web 2.0: a case study in aligning teaching, learning and assessment with professional practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(Special issue), 846–862.
  27. Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual)–A literature review. Computers in Human Behaviour, 29(5), A60–A68. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars’ participation and practices on Twitter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336–349. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Waycott, J., Gray, K., Clerehan, R., Hamilton, M., Richardson, J., Sheard, J., & Thompson, C. (2010). Implications for academic integrity of using web 2.0 for teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 6(2), 8–18. · doi:10.21913/ijei.v6i2.699
  30. Wheeler, S. (2010). Open content, open learning 2.0: using wikis and blogs in higher education. In Changing cultures in higher education (pp. 103–114). Heidelberg: Springer Berlin. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03582-1_9
  31. Young, J. R. (2010). Teaching with Twitter: not for the faint of heart. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(7), 9–12.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chawinga, W. D.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-01-25
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
2365-9440 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/s41239-017-0041-6
OpenAlex
W2581775479
Cited by
299
References
7
FWCI
55.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.