Cited by 28Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

11C-UCB-J synaptic PET and multimodal imaging in dementia with Lewy bodies

Open access
Nicastro, Nicolas, Holland, Negin, Savulich, George, Carter, Stephen F., Mak, Elijah, Hong, Young T., Milicevic Sephton, Selena, Fryer, Tim D. +3 more·2020·European Journal of Hybrid Imaging

Abstract

Objective: Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is a common cause of dementia, but atrophy is mild compared to Alzheimer’s disease. We propose that DLB is associated instead with severe synaptic loss, and we test this hypothesis in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of 11 C-UCB-J, a ligand for presynaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A), a vesicle membrane protein ubiquitously expressed in synapses. Methods: We performed 11 C-UCB-J PET in two DLB patients (an amyloid-negative male and an amyloid-positive female in their 70s) and 10 similarly aged healthy controls. The DLB subjects also underwent PET imaging of amyloid (11 C-PiB) and tau (18 F-AV-1451).11 C-UCB-J binding was quantified using non-displaceable binding potential (BP ND) determined from dynamic imaging. Changes in 11 C-UCB-J binding were correlated with MRI regional brain volume,11 C-PiB uptake and 18 F-AV-1451 binding. Results: Compared to controls, both patients had decreased 11 C-UCB-J binding, especially in parietal and occipital regions (FDR-corrected p< 0.05). There were no significant correlations across regions between 11 C-UCB-J binding and grey matter, tau (18 F-AV1451) or amyloid (11 C-PiB) in either patient. Conclusions: Quantitative imaging of in vivo synaptic density in DLB is a promising approach to understanding the mechanisms of DLB, over and above changes in grey matter volume and concurrent amyloid/tau deposition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s41824-020-00093-9

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Severe synaptic loss has been observed using 11C-UCBJ PET in series of cases with DLB, FTD, PD, PDD, PSP, CBD, and C9Orf72 mutation carriers.

    “while severe synaptic loss has been observed using 11C -UCBJ PET in series of cases with DLB, FTD, PD, PDD, PSP, CBD and C9Orf72 mutation carriers [205–209].”

    From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [209]

    The Discussion reports marked synaptic loss on 11C-UCB-J PET in two DLB cases and cites reduced binding in PD; the Introduction also reports reductions in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. The paper does not address the claimed PET findings in FTD, PDD, or C9orf72 mutation carriers, so it supports only part of the multi-condition sentence. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holland N, Jones PS, Savulich G, et al. Synaptic loss in primary tauopathies revealed by (11C)-UCB-J positron emission tomography. Mov Disord 2020 (in press) PMC7611123 32652635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicastro, N., Holland, N., Savulich, G., Carter, S. F., Mak, E., Hong, Y. T., Milicevic Sephton, S., Fryer, T. D., Aigbirhio, F. I., Rowe, J. B., & O’Brien, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Nicastro, Nicolas
Venue
European Journal of Hybrid Imaging
Published
2020-12
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
25-25
ISSN
2510-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116208050
Cited by
28
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Hybrid Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (103838)
  • NIHR Cambridge MRC CBU
  • Cambridge Center for Parkinson Plus
  • Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
dementia with Lewy bodies, [11C]UCB-J, synaptic density, synaptic loss, amyloid, tau protein, [11C]PIB, 18F-AV-1451, multimodal imaging, non-displaceable binding potential, brain atrophy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review