Cited by 79Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

In Vivo Synaptic Density Imaging with 11 C-UCB-J Detects Treatment Effects of Saracatinib in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer Disease

Open access
Toyonaga, Takuya, Smith, Levi M., Finnema, Sjoerd J., Gallezot, Jean-Dominique, Naganawa, Mika, Bini, Jason, Mulnix, Tim, Cai, Zhengxin +4 more·2019·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

11C-UCB-J is a new PET tracer for synaptic density imaging. Recently, we conducted 11C-UCB-J PET on patients with mild cognitive impairment or early Alzheimer disease (AD) and found a 41% decrease in specific binding in the hippocampus compared with healthy subjects. We hypothesized that 11C-UCB-J may have potential to be a general biomarker for evaluating AD treatment effects via monitoring of synaptic density changes. In this study, we performed longitudinal 11C-UCB-J PET on AD mice to measure the treatment effects of saracatinib, which previously demonstrated synaptic changes with postmortem methods. Methods: Nine wild-type (WT) mice and 9 amyloid precursor protein and presenilin 1 double-transgenic (APPswe/PS1ΔE9 [APP/PS1]) mice underwent 3 11C-UCB-J PET measurements: at baseline, after treatment, and during drug washout. After baseline measurements, saracatinib, a Fyn kinase inhibitor currently in clinical development for AD treatment, was administered by oral gavage for 41 ± 11 d. Treatment-phase measurements were performed on the last day of treatment, and washout-phase measurements occurred more than 27 d after the end of treatment. SUVs from 30 to 60 min after injection of 11C-UCB-J were calculated and normalized by the whole-brain (WB) or brain stem (BS) average values as SUV ratio (SUVR(WB) or SUVR-1(BS)). Results: Hippocampal SUVR(WB) at baseline was significantly lower in APP/PS1 than WT mice (APP/PS1: 1.11 ± 0.04, WT: 1.15 ± 0.02, P = 0.033, unpaired t test). Using SUVR-1(BS) in the hippocampus, there was also a significant difference at baseline (APP/PS1: 0.48 ± 0.13, WT: 0.65 ± 0.10, P = 0.017, unpaired t test). After treatment with saracatinib, hippocampal SUVR(WB) in APP/PS1 mice was significantly increased (P = 0.037, paired t test). A trend-level treatment effect was seen with hippocampal SUVR-1(BS). Saracatinib treatment effects may persist, as there were no significant differences between WT and APP/PS1 mice after drug washout. Conclusion: On the basis of the 11C-UCB-J PET results, hippocampal synaptic density was lower in APP/PS1 mice than in WT mice at baseline, and this deficit was normalized by treatment with saracatinib. These results support the use of 11C-UCB-J PET to identify disease-specific synaptic deficits and to monitor treatment effects in AD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.118.223867

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [9]9. Kaufman AC, Salazar SV, Haas LT, et al. Fyn inhibition rescues established memory and synapse loss in Alzheimer mice. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:953-971.
  2. [12]12. Jankowsky JL, Fadale DJ, Anderson J, et al. Mutant presenilins specifically elevate the levels of the 42 residue b -amyloid peptide in vivo: evidence for augmentation of a 42-specific gamma secretase. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:159-170.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toyonaga, T., Smith, L. M., Finnema, S. J., Gallezot, J.-D., Naganawa, M., Bini, J., Mulnix, T., Cai, Z., Ropchan, J., Huang, Y., Strittmatter, S. M., & Carson, R. E.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
1780-1786
ISSN
  • 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-662X
OpenAlex
W2945441952
Cited by
79
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Georgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance (UL1TR000142)
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • National Institutes of Health (1s10od010322-01a1, UL1TR000142, TR000142, UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1AG053000, P50AG047270, U01AG058608, R01AG034924)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
[11C]UCB-J, saracatinib, Alzheimer's disease, APP/PS1 mice, hippocampus, treatment response biomarkers, amyloid precursor protein, presenilin 1, drug washout, mild cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Kinetics, Male, Pyridines, Pyrrolidines, Pyrrolidinones, Quinazolines, Synapses, Positron-Emission Tomography, Mice, Benzodioxoles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review