Cited by 24Connective tissue disorders researchOral and gingival health researchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Survey on joint hypermobility in university students aged 18–25 years old

Open access
Antonio, Darcisio Hortelan, Magalhaes, Claudia Saad·2018·Advances in Rheumatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Joint hypermobility is defined as a wide range of movements beyond the physiological limits, it has been recognized in healthy people, gymnasts, acrobats, and carriers of genetic affections of connective tissue. A survey among young adults was conducted to describe the frequency of joint hypermobility, estimating its impact on function and quality of life. METHODS: Volunteer university students aged 18 to 25 years old who answered a valid 5-item questionnaire about hypermobility, a physical activity questionnaire, and the Brazilian version of the Medical Outcome Survey Short Form 36 (SF-36) were included. Hypermobility was also assessed by a guided self-examination, with Beighton's criteria being scored and scores greater than or equal to 4 or less than 4 being discriminated. RESULTS: A total of 388 subjects were included, of which 299 were women (77.06%) and 89 were men (22.94%); the median age was 23 years old. Generalized joint hypermobility (Beighton score ≥ 4) was observed in 104 individuals (26.8%). Localized hypermobility (Beighton score 1-3) was observed in 135 (34.79%) individuals, where the hypermobility of the 5th finger was the most frequent in 165 (57.47%) individuals, followed by hypermobility of the thumb in 126 (32.56%) individuals, hypermobility of the elbows and knees each in 72 (18.6%) individuals, and hypermobility of the spine in 69 (17.79%) individuals. The descriptive observation of physical activity indicated regular practice. The correlation coefficients between the SF-36 domains and hypermobility scores were very low and statistical comparison not significant. CONCLUSION: In this population of youngsters, predominantly women, localized hypermobility was more frequent than generalized hypermobility; however, with low impact on health domains and quality of life scores, estimated in each domain of the SF-36, the physical and mental component scores, and the time dedicated to physical activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s42358-018-0008-x

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of college students (typical ages between 18 and 24) report a GJH prevalence between 11%-12.5% and other studies between 12.5%-26%.

    “Studies of “college students” (typical ages between 18 and 24) report a GJH prevalence between 11%-12.5%[16,17] and other between 12.5%-26%.[2,18,19]”

    From Hypermobility spectrum disorders: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [19]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moraes DA, Baptista CA, Crippa JA, Louzada-Junior P. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese and validation of the five-part questionnaire for identifying hypermobility. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011;51:53-69.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antonio, D. H., & Magalhaes, C. S.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Venue
Advances in Rheumatology
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
  • 0482-5004 (ISSN-L)
  • 2523-3106
OpenAlex
W2806841883
Cited by
24
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Oral and gingival health research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
joint hypermobility, generalized joint hypermobility, Beighton score, university students, young adults, quality of life, physical activity, sex differences, connective tissue diseases
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Quality of Life, Students, Universities, Exercise, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review