Cited by 3Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Evaluation of potential association of metabolic syndrome in obese and non-obese PCOS women

Open access
Kaur, Raminder, Kaur, Maninder·2024·Middle East Fertility Society Journal

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome is an escalating endocrinal and reproductive disorder among women of reproductive age and is considered the foremost health burden. Therefore, the present study is an attempt to estimate the potential association of metabolic syndrome in obese and non-obese PCOS women. A total of 250 PCOS women ranging in age from 18 to 45 years and living in the Chandigarh Capital Region were selected from the OPD, PGIMER, Chandigarh, (North India). Rotterdam Criteria (2003) was employed to diagnose polycystic ovary syndrome among women. Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) as assessed by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP ATP III) was found to be 30% (4% in non-obese and 26% in obese) in PCOS women. Waist circumference > 88 cm is the most prevalent feature in PCOS women (67.2%) followed by HDL < 50 mg/dL (56.8%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited that visceral adiposity index (VAI) was a significant determinant of metabolic syndrome in obese (OR = 1.17, p < 0.01) and non-obese (OR = 1.2, p < 0.01) PCOS women. Results of ROC analysis further established visceral adiposity index as a potential determinant in metabolic syndrome in both the groups of PCOS women. In obese PCOS women, the W/H ratio also depicted accuracy in predicting metabolic syndrome risk. Conclusions: Visceral adiposity index is a significant tool to assess the metabolic syndrome in both groups, i.e., obese and non-obese. However, the waist/hip ratio can be considered as a predictive tool in obese women only. Thus, it could be used as a significant and inexpensive tool in clinical practices for early detection of metabolic syndrome in PCOS women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s43043-024-00170-0

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaur, R., & Kaur, M.
Affiliations
Panjab University (IN)
Corresponding author
Kaur, Raminder
Venue
Middle East Fertility Society Journal
Published
2024-01-26
Volume
29
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 1110-5690 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-3251
OpenAlex
W4391260967
Cited by
2
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Middle East Fertility Society Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, metabolic syndrome, obesity, visceral adiposity index, waist-to-hip ratio, Rotterdam criteria, NCEP ATP III criteria, waist circumference, HDL cholesterol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review