Cited by 86Semiconductor Lasers and Optical DevicesPhotonic and Optical DevicesAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials

High-speed Si-Ge avalanche photodiodes

Open access
Wang, Binhao, Mu, Jifang·2022·PhotoniX

Abstract

High-speed optical interconnects of data centers and high performance computers (HPC) have become the rapid development direction in the field of optical communication owing to the explosive growth of market demand. Currently, optical interconnect systems are moving towards higher capacity and integration. High-sensitivity receivers with avalanche photodiodes (APDs) are paid more attention due to the capability to enhance gain bandwidth. The impact ionization coefficient ratio is one crucial parameter for avalanche photodiode optimization, which significantly affects the excess noise and the gain bandwidth product (GBP). The development of silicon-germanium (Si-Ge) APDs are promising thanks to the low impact ionization coefficient ratio of silicon, the simple structure, and the CMOS compatible process. Separate absorption charge multiplication (SACM) structures are typically adopted in Si-Ge APDs to achieve high bandwidth and low noise. This paper reviews design and optimization in high-speed Si-Ge APDs, including advanced APD structures, APD modeling and APD receivers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s43074-022-00052-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although relatively easier to achieve in Si APDs at 850 nm, simultaneous (at the same bias voltage) optimization of gain-BW-noise has remained challenging for low-voltage Si/Ge APDs or Si resonant APDs in C/L/O bands.

    “Although relatively easier to achieve in Si APDs at 850 nm117, simultaneous (at the same bias voltage) optimization of gain-BW-noise has remained challenging for low-voltage Si/Ge APDs118 or Si resonant APDs119,120 in C/L/O bands.”

    From Roadmapping the next generation of silicon photonics (2024) · cites this paper as [118]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, B., & Mu, J.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Binhao
Venue
PhotoniX
Published
2022-03-25
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2662-1991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229001774
Cited by
86
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PhotoniX (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Xi'an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics
  • State Key Laboratory of Transient Optics and Photonics
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
Keywords
high-speed photodetectors, optical interconnects, data centers, gain-bandwidth product, excess noise, high-sensitivity receiver, CMOS-compatible photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review