The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Promoting Undergraduate Interest, Preparedness, and Professional Pursuit in the Sciences: An Outcomes Evaluation of the SURE Program at Emory University
Open accessAbstract
We report on an outcomes assessment of the Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) Program at Emory University in Atlanta, GA. Using follow-up survey data and academic transcripts, we gauge SURE's impact on levels of interest in, preparedness for, and actual pursuit of graduate study and professional careers in the sciences for the program's first 15 summer cohorts (1990–2004). Our follow-up survey indicated significant increases in all research preparedness skills considered, notably in ability to give a poster research presentation, to discuss research at a graduate school interview, and to apply research ethics principles. About a third of SURE graduates went on to complete a graduate degree >90% considered SURE as important or very important in their academic development. Respondents reported postprogram increases in the level of interest in academic and research careers, and reported high levels of employment in science careers and job satisfaction. Regression analyses of Emory SURE participant transcripts revealed that participants take significantly more science courses as seniors and earn higher grades in those courses than nonparticipants. This trend held after correcting for indicators of prior interest (first-year course work, GPA, and math SAT scores), gender, and minority status. We also report on an external survey completed by SURE participants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cumulative evidence suggests that research experience helps students to build up their science identity (e.g., Junge et al., 2010; Grunert and Bodner, 2011; Schultz et al., 2011; Thiry et al., 2011; Strawn and Livelybrooks, 2012; Adedokun et al., 2013; Merolla and Serpe, 2013).”
From Outcomes and Processes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program: STEM PhD Completion, Sense of Community, Perceived Program Benefit, Science Identity, and Research Self-Efficacy (2016) · cites this paper as Junge et al., 2010
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“80% reported science-pipeline sustaining gains consistent with what has previously been reported in the literature [25], [29], [35], [36], [39], [40].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The number of pipeline college graduates who enrolled in a graduate program (71%) is comparable to or higher than what has previously been reported by other groups [25], [26], [34], [41].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For the UTP participants, the benefits of improved research abilities and increased efficacy are likely to affect subsequent performance in science courses [25] as well as positively influence the self-assurance with which UTP students approach graduate education [20], [26]–[28].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
MTW, & Long, J. S. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965458 · Cited by 6,891
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables
Calvin, J. A., & Long, J. S. (1998) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1271407 · Cited by 5,290
Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences
Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140384 · Cited by 1,380
Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & DeAntoni, T. (2004) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10131 · Cited by 1,332
Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning
Lopatto, D. (2007) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039 · Cited by 1,009
Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings
Lopatto, D. (2004) · Cell Biology Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045 · Cited by 969
Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention
Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J. S. (1998) · The Review of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0016 · Cited by 724
Kardash, C. M. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191 · Cited by 563
Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience
Bauer, K. W., & Bennett, J. S. (2003) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2003.0011 · Cited by 535
(2002) · Journal of college student development · Cited by 459
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- Adhikari A., 2002, Notices AMS, 49, 1252
- Campbell A., 2004, J. Coll. Sci. Teach, 33, 24
- Carsrud A. L., 1980, Paper presented at American Psychological Association Annual Meeting
- Coleman J., 2005, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 25, 154
- Crowe M., 2006, Peer Rev, 8, 16
- Crowe M., 2008, Counc. Undergrad. Res, 28, 43
- Delagarza J. M., 1991, Eng. Educ, 81, 384
- Dirks C., 2006, Educ, 5, 218
- Elgren T., 2006, Peer Rev, 8, 4
- Fields E. F., 1971, Final Report
- Foertsch J. A., 1997, Evaluation of the UW/Madison's summer undergraduate research programs: final report
- Gafney L., 2001, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 21, 172
- Gregerman S. R., 1999, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 20, 54
- Hakim T., 1998, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 189
- Hathaway R., 2002, J. Coll. Stud. Dev, 43, 614
- Ishiyama J., 2001, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 22, 36
- Kremer J. F., 1990, J. Res. Dev. Educ, 24, 1
- Lopatto D., 2004, Paper presented at the Council on Undergraduate Research Annual Meeting, 4
- Mabrouk P. A., 2000, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 21, 25
- Manduca C., 1997, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 64
- Merkel C. A., 2001, Undergraduate Research at Six Research Universities
- Okorodudu C., 1970, Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting
- Palladino J. J., 1982, Teach. Psychol, 9, 72
- Peppas N. A., 1981, Chem. Eng. Educ, 15, 135
- Russell S. H., 2006, Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: synthesis report
- Schowen B., 1998, Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences (workshop report)
- Schowen B., 2002, ConfChem Conference on Undergraduate Research
- Spilich G., 1997, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 57
- Winthrop University Undergraduate Research Advisory Committee, 2006, Undergraduate Research as a Deep Learning Experience
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities
Linn, M. C., Palmer, E., Baranger, A. M., Gerard, E., & Stone, E. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1261757 · Cited by 829
Carpi, A., Ronan, D. M., Falconer, H. M., & Lents, N. H. (2017) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21341 · Cited by 394
Reimagining the Pipeline: Advancing STEM Diversity, Persistence, and Success
Ramdial, S.-A. A. A., & Campbell, A. G. (2014) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biu076 · Cited by 309
Gibbs, K. D., & Griffin, K. A. (2013) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-02-0021 · Cited by 261
Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE Guide No. 69
Laidlaw, A. H., Aiton, J., Struthers, J., & Guild, S. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.704438 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Junge, B., Quiñones, C., Kakietek, J., Teodorescu, D., & Marsteller, P.
- Affiliations
- SUNY New Paltz (US)
- Center for Science Education,
- Department of Political Science, and
- Corresponding author
- Junge, Benjamin
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-132
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2879378
- OpenAlex
- W2162310693
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Emory University
- Grinnell College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- undergraduate research programs, science career interest, research preparedness, graduate school enrollment, research ethics, poster presentations, academic performance, outcome measurement, Emory University
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Career Choice, Education, Graduate, Regression Analysis, Research, Science, Students, Teaching, Universities, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
