Cited by 116Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesHealth and Medical Research Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promoting Undergraduate Interest, Preparedness, and Professional Pursuit in the Sciences: An Outcomes Evaluation of the SURE Program at Emory University

Open access

Abstract

We report on an outcomes assessment of the Summer Undergraduate Research Experience (SURE) Program at Emory University in Atlanta, GA. Using follow-up survey data and academic transcripts, we gauge SURE's impact on levels of interest in, preparedness for, and actual pursuit of graduate study and professional careers in the sciences for the program's first 15 summer cohorts (1990–2004). Our follow-up survey indicated significant increases in all research preparedness skills considered, notably in ability to give a poster research presentation, to discuss research at a graduate school interview, and to apply research ethics principles. About a third of SURE graduates went on to complete a graduate degree >90% considered SURE as important or very important in their academic development. Respondents reported postprogram increases in the level of interest in academic and research careers, and reported high levels of employment in science careers and job satisfaction. Regression analyses of Emory SURE participant transcripts revealed that participants take significantly more science courses as seniors and earn higher grades in those courses than nonparticipants. This trend held after correcting for indicators of prior interest (first-year course work, GPA, and math SAT scores), gender, and minority status. We also report on an external survey completed by SURE participants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.09-08-0057

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Adhikari A., 2002, Notices AMS, 49, 1252
  2. Campbell A., 2004, J. Coll. Sci. Teach, 33, 24
  3. Carsrud A. L., 1980, Paper presented at American Psychological Association Annual Meeting
  4. Coleman J., 2005, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 25, 154
  5. Crowe M., 2006, Peer Rev, 8, 16
  6. Crowe M., 2008, Counc. Undergrad. Res, 28, 43
  7. Delagarza J. M., 1991, Eng. Educ, 81, 384
  8. Dirks C., 2006, Educ, 5, 218
  9. Elgren T., 2006, Peer Rev, 8, 4
  10. Fields E. F., 1971, Final Report
  11. Foertsch J. A., 1997, Evaluation of the UW/Madison's summer undergraduate research programs: final report
  12. Gafney L., 2001, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 21, 172
  13. Gregerman S. R., 1999, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 20, 54
  14. Hakim T., 1998, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 189
  15. Hathaway R., 2002, J. Coll. Stud. Dev, 43, 614
  16. Ishiyama J., 2001, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 22, 36
  17. Kremer J. F., 1990, J. Res. Dev. Educ, 24, 1
  18. Lopatto D., 2004, Paper presented at the Council on Undergraduate Research Annual Meeting, 4
  19. Mabrouk P. A., 2000, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 21, 25
  20. Manduca C., 1997, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 64
  21. Merkel C. A., 2001, Undergraduate Research at Six Research Universities
  22. Okorodudu C., 1970, Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting
  23. Palladino J. J., 1982, Teach. Psychol, 9, 72
  24. Peppas N. A., 1981, Chem. Eng. Educ, 15, 135
  25. Russell S. H., 2006, Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities: synthesis report
  26. Schowen B., 1998, Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences (workshop report)
  27. Schowen B., 2002, ConfChem Conference on Undergraduate Research
  28. Spilich G., 1997, Counc. Undergrad. Res. Q, 18, 57
  29. Winthrop University Undergraduate Research Advisory Committee, 2006, Undergraduate Research as a Deep Learning Experience

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Junge, B., Quiñones, C., Kakietek, J., Teodorescu, D., & Marsteller, P.
Affiliations
  • SUNY New Paltz (US)
  • Center for Science Education,
  • Department of Political Science, and
Corresponding author
Junge, Benjamin
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2010-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
119-132
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162310693
Cited by
116
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Emory University
  • Grinnell College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
undergraduate research programs, science career interest, research preparedness, graduate school enrollment, research ethics, poster presentations, academic performance, outcome measurement, Emory University
MeSH terms
Workforce, Career Choice, Education, Graduate, Regression Analysis, Research, Science, Students, Teaching, Universities, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review