Cited by 969Career Development and DiversityHigher Education Research StudiesHealth and Medical Research Impacts

Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings

Open access
Lopatto, David·2004·Cell Biology Education

Abstract

In this study, I examined the hypothesis that undergraduate research enhances the educational experience of science undergraduates, attracts and retains talented students to careers in science, and acts as a pathway for minority students into science careers. Undergraduates from 41 institutions participated in an online survey on the benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Participants indicated gains on 20 potential benefits and reported on career plans. Over 83% of 1,135 participants began or continued to plan for postgraduate education in the sciences. A group of 51 students who discontinued their plans for postgraduate science education reported significantly lower gains than continuing students. Women and men reported similar levels of benefits and similar patterns of career plans. Ethnic groups did not significantly differ in reported levels of benefits or plans to continue with postgraduate education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.04-07-0045

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have failed to find evidence that students of different genders or races differ in their scientific identity or intentions to pursue postgraduate education in biology or STEM after a research experience.

    “These results are somewhat surprising, given that previous studies have failed to find evidence that students of different genders or races differ in their scientific identity or intentions to pursue postgraduate education in biology or STEM after a research experience (Lopatto, 2004; Eagan et al., 2013; Robnett et al., 2015).”

    From Race and Gender Differences in Undergraduate Research Mentoring Structures and Research Outcomes (2017) · cites this paper as Lopatto, 2004

    The Abstract and the sections on gender and ethnic differences report broadly similar postgraduate science plans and no significant group differences in how the research experience influenced those plans. The paper does not assess scientific identity, and its ethnic-group analysis notes relatively less interest among Asian-American students in biology-related Ph.D. programs, so the claim is too broad for biology-specific intentions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • For the UTP participants, the benefits of improved research abilities and increased efficacy are likely to affect subsequent performance in science courses and positively influence the self-assurance with which UTP students approach graduate education.

    “For the UTP participants, the benefits of improved research abilities and increased efficacy are likely to affect subsequent performance in science courses [25] as well as positively influence the self-assurance with which UTP students approach graduate education [20], [26]–[28].”

    From Underrepresented Minority High School and College Students Report STEM-Pipeline Sustaining Gains After Participating in the Loma Linda University Summer Health Disparities Research Program (2014) · cites this paper as [27]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]13. Tomovic, M.M. (1994). Undergraduate research-prerequisite for successful lifelong learning. ASEE Annu. Conf. Proc. 1, 1469-1470.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lopatto, D.
Affiliations
Grinnell College (US)
Corresponding author
Lopatto, David
Venue
Cell Biology Education
Published
2004-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
270-277
ISSN
1536-7509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117966700
Cited by
969
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 42
FWCI
32.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Biology Education (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0087611)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
Keywords
undergraduate research experience, undergraduate science students, career aspirations, gender differences, ethnic differences
MeSH terms
Career Choice, Data Collection, Education, Graduate, Ethnicity, Humans, Learning, Research Personnel, Science, Sex Factors, Students, Teaching, Universities, Program Evaluation, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review