Cited by 72Science Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching MethodsUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Effects of a Research-Infused Botanical Curriculum on Undergraduates’ Content Knowledge, STEM Competencies, and Attitudes toward Plant Sciences

Open access
Ward, Jennifer Rhode, Clarke, H. David, Horton, Jonathan L.·2014·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

In response to the American Association for the Advancement of Science's Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education initiative, we infused authentic, plant-based research into majors’ courses at a public liberal arts university. Faculty members designed a financially sustainable pedagogical approach, utilizing vertically integrated curricular modules based on undergraduate researchers’ field and laboratory projects. Our goals were to 1) teach botanical concepts, from cells to ecosystems; 2) strengthen competencies in statistical analysis and scientific writing; 3) pique plant science interest; and 4) allow all undergraduates to contribute to genuine research. Our series of inquiry-centered exercises mitigated potential faculty barriers to adopting research-rich curricula, facilitating teaching/research balance by gathering publishable scholarly data during laboratory class periods. Student competencies were assessed with pre- and postcourse quizzes and rubric-graded papers, and attitudes were evaluated with pre- and postcourse surveys. Our revised curriculum increased students’ knowledge and awareness of plant science topics, improved scientific writing, enhanced statistical knowledge, and boosted interest in conducting research. More than 300 classroom students have participated in our program, and data generated from these modules’ assessment allowed faculty and students to present 28 contributed talks or posters and publish three papers in 4 yr. Future steps include analyzing the effects of repeated module exposure on student learning and creating a regional consortium to increase our project's pedagogical impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.13-12-0231

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Anderson W Banerjee U Drennan C Elgin S Epstein L Science education: changing the culture of science education at research universities Science 2011 331 152 153 21233371
  2. Black P Harrison C Lee C Marshall B William D Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice 2003 Berkshire, England Open University Press
  3. Brownell S Tanner K Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and…tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sci Educ 2012 11 339 346 23222828 PMC3516788
  4. Brownell SE Price J Steinman L A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science Adv Physiol Educ 2013 37 70 79 23471252
  5. Carter FD Mandell M Maton KI The influence of on-campus, academic year undergraduate research on STEM Ph.D. outcomes: evidence from the Meyerhoff scholarship program Educ Evaluation Policy Analysis 2009 31 441 462 PMC3139981 21785521
  6. Chen J Discovery-based science education: functional genomic dissection in Drosophila by undergraduate researchers PLoS Biol 2005 3 207 209 PMC548953 15719063
  7. DeHaan R Teaching creative science thinking Science 2011 334 1499 1500 22174233
  8. Frisch JK Unwin MM Saunders GW Bodzin A Shiner Klein B Weaver S Name that plant! Overcoming plant blindness and developing a sense of place using science and environmental education The Inclusion of Environmental Education in Science Teacher Education 2010 Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer American Society for Cell Biology 143 158
  9. Gafney L Varma-Nelson P Peer-Led Team Learning: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Institutionalization of a College Level Initiative 2008 New York Springer
  10. Gardner S Adedokun O Weaver G Human brains engaged in rat brains: student-driven neuroanatomy research in an introductory biology lab course J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 2011 10 A24 A36 23626490 PMC3598182
  11. Goldey ES Abercrombie CL Ivy TM Kusher DI Moeller JF Rayner DA Smith CF Spivey NW Biological Inquiry: a new course and assessment plan in response to the call to transform undergraduate biology CBE Life Sci Educ 2012 11 353 363 23222831 PMC3516791
  12. Handelsman J Scientific teaching Science 2004 304 521 522 15105480
  13. Handelsman J Miller S Pfund C Scientific Teaching 2007 New York Freeman 19039122
  14. Heleno R Lacerda I Ramos JA Memmott J Evaluation of restoration effectiveness: community response to the removal of alien plants Ecol Appl 2010 20 1191 1203 20666243
  15. Henderson C Dancy MH Physics faculty and educational researchers: divergent expectations as barriers to the diffusion of innovations AIP Conference Proceedings 2006 818 1 149 152
  16. Horton JL Francis JD Using dendroecology to examine the effect of Oriental bittersweet (Celastrus orbiculatus) invasion on tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) growth. American Midland Naturalist (in press) 2014
  17. Kloser M Brownell S Chiariello N Fukami T Integrating teaching and research in undergraduate biology laboratory education PLoS Biol 2011 9 e1001174 22110400 PMC3216991
  18. Lim W Mudge K Vermeylen F Effects of population, age, and cultivation methods on ginsenoside content of wild American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) J Agric Food Chem 2005 53 8498 8505 16248544
  19. Mathews KE Adams P Goos M Using the principles of BIO2010 to develop an introductory, interdisciplinary course for biology students CBE Life Sci Educ 2010 9 290 297 20810961 PMC2931676
  20. Mooney E McGraw J Effects of self-pollination and outcrossing with cultivated plants in small natural populations of American ginseng, Panax quinquefolius (Araliaceae) Am J Bot 2007 94 1677 1687 21636364
  21. National Research Council How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School 2003 Washington, DC National Academies Press
  22. Poff NL Olden JD Merritt D Pepin D Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007 104 5732 5737 17360379 PMC1851560
  23. Ruiz-Primo MA Briggs D Iverson H Talbot R Shepard LA Impacts of undergraduate science course innovations on learning Science 2011 331 1269 1270 21393529
  24. Schlag E McIntosh M Ginsenoside content and variation among and within American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) populations Phytochemistry 2006 67 1510 1519 16839573
  25. Smith SM Lenhoff HD Reforming undergrad biology curriculum Science 2002 298 747 747 12400541
  26. Wei CA Woodin T Undergraduate research experiences in biology: alternatives to the apprenticeship model CBE Life Sci Educ 2011 10 123 131 21633057 PMC3105915
  27. Woodin T Smith D Allen D Transforming undergraduate biology education for all students: an action plan for the twenty-first century CBE Life Sci Educ 2009 8 271 273 19952093 PMC2786275
  28. Wu Q Transcript profiles of Panax quinquefolius from flower, leaf, and root bring new insights into genes related to ginsenosides biosynthesis and transcriptional regulation Physiol Plant 2010 138 134 149 19947964

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, J. R., Clarke, H. D., & Horton, J. L.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Asheville (US)
Corresponding author
Ward, Jennifer Rhode
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2014-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
387-396
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133757689
Cited by
72
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
17.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0420295, 0821062)
  • North Carolina Biotechnology Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
botany education, undergraduate research, STEM skills, scientific writing, statistical analysis skills, inquiry-based learning, Vision and Change, teaching-research balance
MeSH terms
Attitude, Botany, Communication, Curriculum, Engineering, Mathematics, Publications, Research, Science, Statistics as Topic, Students, Technology, Universities, Knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review