The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Inclusive Teaching
Open accessAbstract
Over the past two decades, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) faculty have been striving to make their teaching practices more inclusive and welcoming to the variety of students who enter college. However, many STEM faculty, even those at teaching-focused institutions, have been educated in a traditional environment that emphasizes research and may not include classroom teaching. This can produce a deficit in training that leaves many STEM faculty feeling uncertain about inclusive teaching practices and their essential undergirding principles. This essay describes an online, evidence-based teaching guide ( https://lse.ascb.org/evidence-based-teaching-guides/inclusive-teaching ) intended to help fill this gap, serving as a resource for science faculty as they work to become more inclusive, particular with regard to differences in race, ethnicity, and gender. The guide describes the importance of developing self-awareness and empathy for students as a precursor to considering classroom practices. It also explores the role of classroom climate before turning to pedagogical choices that can support students’ sense of belonging, competence, and interest in the course. Finally, the guide suggests that true inclusivity is a community effort and that instructors should leverage local and national networks to maximize student learning and inclusion. Each of these essential points is supported by summaries of and links to articles that can inform these choices. The guide also includes an instructor checklist that offers a concise summary of key points with actionable steps that can guide instructors as they work toward a more inclusive practice. We hope that the guide will provide value for both faculty who are just beginning to consider how to change their teaching practices and faculty seeking to enrich their current efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
Teaching to transgress: education as the practice of freedom
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4628 · Cited by 8,835
Moore, E. C., & Dewey, J. (1917) · The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods · doi:10.2307/2940197 · Cited by 6,772
Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences
Correll, S. J., Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2655673 · Cited by 3,086
Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels
Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.75.3.203-220 · Cited by 1,112
Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x · Cited by 1,048
Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology
Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1204820 · Cited by 959
Improving Underrepresented Minority Student Persistence in STEM
Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A. G., Campbell, P. B., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutiérrez, C. G., Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., et al. (2016) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0038 · Cited by 793
Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do.
Steele, C. M. (2011) · W.W. Norton eBooks · Cited by 740
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276 · Cited by 713
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Alfasi M., 2003, Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30, 28
- Frost R. A., 2010, Community College Enterprise, 16, 37
- Purdie J. R., 2011, College Student Affairs Journal, 29, 95
- Thelin J. R., 2011, A history of American higher education
Cited by
Pfeifer, M. A., Reiter, E. M., Cordero, J. J., & Stanton, J. D. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-06-0107 · Cited by 85
Driessen, E., Beatty, A., Stokes, A., Wood, S., & Ballen, C. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6741 · Cited by 34
Promoting Achievement for Community College STEM Students through Equity-Minded Practices
Varty, A. K. (2022) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.21-09-0237 · Cited by 24
Diversity in nursing and challenges with the NCLEX-RN
Muirhead, L., Cimiotti, J. P., Hayes, R., Haynes-Ferere, A., Martyn, K., Owen, M., & McCauley, L. (2022) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2022.06.003 · Cited by 20
Angell, D. K., Lane-Getaz, S., Okonek, T., & Smith, S. (2024) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.22-10-0212 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewsbury, B., & Brame, C. J.
- Venue
- CBE—Life Sciences Education
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- fe2
- ISSN
- 1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233093565
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 66.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inclusive Teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021
- The paper
- Dewsbury, B., & Brame, C. J. (2019). Inclusive Teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.