Cited by 29Higher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and DiversityMathematics Education and Programs

Promoting Achievement for Community College STEM Students through Equity-Minded Practices

Open access
Varty, Alison K.·2022·CBE—Life Sciences Education

Abstract

HIGHLIGHT:This study aims to describe U.S. community college STEM students by highlighting the unique characteristics that distinguish them from other U.S. undergraduates while also illuminating their academic stumbling blocks and achievement disparities. These analyses are used to propose equity-based strategies to promote this group’s achievement in STEM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1187/cbe.21-09-0237

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • About one-third of STEM students in the United States are currently enrolled in 2-year colleges.

    “given that about one-third of STEM students in the United States are currently enrolled in 2-year colleges (Varty, 2022)”

    From Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom (2023) · cites this paper as Varty, 2022

    In the Introduction section comparing community college students with other undergraduates (page unavailable), Varty reports that 33.4% of all U.S. undergraduates attended 2-year public colleges in fall 2018—not that one-third of STEM students did. The same section gives the proportion of entrants majoring in STEM at each institution type, but not the share of U.S. STEM students enrolled at 2-year colleges. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The paucity of pedagogical approaches developed for or tested at 2-year colleges calls into question the effectiveness of such techniques across a broader range of students and the generalizability of the assessment data provided in these papers.

    “This paucity of pedagogical approaches developed for or tested at 2-year colleges is striking, given that about one-third of STEM students in the United States are currently enrolled in 2-year colleges (Varty, 2022), and calls into question the effectiveness of such techniques across a broader range of students and the generalizability of the assessment data provided in these papers.”

    From Reading Primary Scientific Literature: Approaches for Teaching Students in the Undergraduate STEM Classroom (2023) · cites this paper as Varty, 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Community college STEM students are more diverse and contain a greater percentage of students historically minoritized in STEM compared with their 4-year counterparts, and these students face unique challenges in STEM.

    “as community college STEM students are more diverse and contain a greater percentage of students historically minoritized in STEM compared with their 4-year counterparts, and these students face unique challenges in STEM (Hoffman et al., 2010; Varty, 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Burke, C. Luu, R. Lai, A. Hsiao, V. Cheung, E. Tamashiro, D. Ashcroft, J. (2020). Making STEM equitable: An active learning approach to closing the achievement gap. International Journal of Active Learning, 2, 71– 85.
  2. Freeman, S. Pape-Lindstrom, P. Casper, A. Eddy, S. (2020). Community college students rise to the challenge. Journal of College Science Teaching, 49(5), 7– 16.
  3. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: Americans science and technology talent at the crossroads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 22379652
  4. Parker, C. Morrell, C. Morrell, C. Chang, L. (2016). Shifting understandings of community college faculty members: Results of an equity-focused professional development experience. Journal of Faculty Development, 30(3), 41– 47.
  5. Reed, S. Grosz, M. Kurlaender, M. Cooper, S. (2021). A portrait of student parents in the California Community Colleges. UC Davis Wheelhouse Research Brief, 6(2), 1– 13.
  6. Smith, A. (2007). Professional development issues for community colleges. Peer Review, 9(4), 23. Retrieved January 4, 2022, from www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/professional-development-issues -community-colleges
  7. Thayer, P. B. (2000). Retention of students from first generation and low income backgrounds. The Journal of the Council for Opportunity in Education. Retrieved March 30, 2022, from http://www.pellinstitute.org/downloads/trio_clearinghouse-Thayer_May_2000.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varty, A. K.
Affiliations
College of the Siskiyous (US)
Corresponding author
Varty, Alison K.
Venue
CBE—Life Sciences Education
Published
2022-06
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
ar25-ar25
ISSN
1931-7913 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280520571
Cited by
24
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • CBE—Life Sciences Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
community college students, STEM education, educational equity, academic performance, underrepresented minorities, remedial education, faculty diversity, active learning, student retention, STEM degree attainment, first-generation college students, low-income students, working students
MeSH terms
Engineering, Humans, Mathematics, Students, Technology, Universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review