The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is the best way to help caregivers in cancer and palliative care? A systematic literature review of interventions and their effectiveness
Abstract
Informal carers in cancer and palliative care are known to have high needs and psychological morbidity, yet a literature review identified few targeted interventions. This systematic review of interventions for carers of patients using home cancer and palliative care services searched Medline, CancerLit, PsycInfo and Cinahl databases. The terms used were carer(s), caregiver(s), palliative and cancer. Papers that reported interventions for adults actively providing informal care for noninstitutionalized cancer and palliative care patients were reviewed. Twenty-two interventions were identified, comprising home nursing care (four), respite services (three), social networks and activity enhancement (two), problem solving and education (three) and group work (10). Of these, nine were delivered solely to carers (i.e., were targeted services). Only six of the carers' interventions had been evaluated, two of these had used a randomized control trial (RCT; grades IB), three employed a single group methodology (two prospective grades IIIC and one retrospective grade IIIC) and one was evaluated using facilitator feedback. There was a lack of outcome evaluation designs, small sample sizes and a reliance on intervention descriptions and formative evaluations. Methodological challenges may mean alternatives to ‘pure’ RCTs should be considered. The current evidence contributes more to understanding feasibility and acceptability than to effectiveness. Practitioners and evaluators must prioritize the further development of intervention studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs
Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006223422507 · Cited by 3,563
Clinical trials: A practical approach
Daly, M. J. (1984) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-6147(84)90515-7 · Cited by 1,053
Palliative care: views of patients and their families.
Higginson, I., Wade, A., & McCarthy, M. (1990) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.301.6746.277 · Cited by 296
Self-citationIdentifying the concerns of informal carers in palliative care
Payne, S., Smith, P., & Dean, S. (1999) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1191/026921699666872524 · Cited by 292
Psychosocial benefits of a cancer support group
Cain, E. N., Kohorn, E. I., Quinlan, D. M., Latimer, K., & Schwartz, P. E. (1986) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19860101)57:1<183::aid-cncr2820570135>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 276
The impact of stroke on informal carers: a literature review
Low, J. T. S., Payne, S., & Roderick, P. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00194-x · Cited by 275
A problem solving intervention for caregivers of cancer patients
Toseland, R. W., Blanchard, C. G., & McCallion, P. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(94)e0093-8 · Cited by 247
Group Interventions To Support Family Caregivers: A Review and Analysis
Toseland, R. W., & Rossiter, C. M. (1989) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/29.4.438 · Cited by 232
Why are trials in palliative care so difficult?
Grande, G. E., & Todd, C. J. (2000) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1191/026921600677940614 · Cited by 215
Identifying the needs of home caregivers of patients with cancer.
Hileman, J. W., Lackey, N. R., & HASSANEIN, R. S. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 194
Cited by
Interventions with Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
Northouse, L. L., Katapodi, M. C., Song, L., Zhang, L., & Mood, D. W. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20081 · Cited by 857
Gomes, B., Calanzani, N., Curiale, V., McCrone, P., Higginson, I. J., & de Brito, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007760.pub2 · Cited by 785
Self-citationRetooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5066 · Cited by 688
Psychosocial Care for Family Caregivers of Patients With Cancer
Northouse, L., Williams, A.-L., Given, B., & McCorkle, R. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.5798 · Cited by 527
Care for the cancer caregiver: A systematic review
Applebaum, A. J., & Breitbart, W. (2013) · Palliative and Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951512000594 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Harding, R., & Higginson, I. J.
- Venue
- Palliative Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-74
- ISSN
- 0269-2163 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-030X
- OpenAlex
- W2045778326
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the best way to help caregivers in cancer and palliative care? A systematic literature review of interventions and their effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1191/0269216303pm667oa
- The paper
- Harding, R., & Higginson, I. J. (2003). What is the best way to help caregivers in cancer and palliative care? A systematic literature review of interventions and their effectiveness. Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216303pm667oa
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.