Cited by 159COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Asian-Pacific perspective on the psychological well-being of healthcare workers during the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Chew, Nicholas W. S., Ngiam, Jinghao Nicholas, Tan, Benjamin Yong-Qiang, Tham, Sai-Meng, Tan, Celine Yan-Shan, Jing, Mingxue, Sagayanathan, Renarebecca, Chen, Jin Tao +25 more·2020·BJPsych Open

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant strain on front-line healthcare workers. AIMS: In this multicentre study, we compared the psychological outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in various countries in the Asia-Pacific region and identified factors associated with adverse psychological outcomes. METHOD: From 29 April to 4 June 2020, the study recruited healthcare workers from major healthcare institutions in five countries in the Asia-Pacific region. A self-administrated survey that collected information on prior medical conditions, presence of symptoms, and scores on the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised were used. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) relating to COVID-19 was compared, and multivariable logistic regression identified independent factors associated with adverse psychological outcomes within each country. RESULTS: A total of 1146 participants from India, Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam were studied. Despite having the lowest volume of cases, Vietnam displayed the highest prevalence of PTSD. In contrast, Singapore reported the highest case volume, but had a lower prevalence of depression and anxiety. In the multivariable analysis, we found that non-medically trained personnel, the presence of physical symptoms and presence of prior medical conditions were independent predictors across the participating countries. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that the varied prevalence of psychological adversity among healthcare workers is independent of the burden of COVID-19 cases within each country. Early psychological interventions may be beneficial for the vulnerable groups of healthcare workers with presence of physical symptoms, prior medical conditions and those who are not medically trained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2020.98

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, N. W. S., Ngiam, J. N., Tan, B. Y.-Q., Tham, S.-M., Tan, C. Y.-S., Jing, M., Sagayanathan, R., Chen, J. T., Wong, L. Y. H., Ahmad, A., Khan, F. A., Marmin, M., Hassan, F. B., Sharon, T. M.-L., Lim, C. H., Mohaini, M. I. B., Danuaji, R., Nguyen, T. H., Tsivgoulis, G., Tsiodras, S., Fragkou, P. C., Dimopoulou, D., Sharma, A. K., Shah, K., Patel, B., Sharma, S., Komalkumar, R. N., Meenakshi, R. V., Talati, S., Teoh, H. L., Ho, C. S., Ho, R. C., & Sharma, V. K.
Affiliations
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Zydus Lifesciences Limited (India) (IN)
  • GCS Medical College (IN)
Corresponding author
Tan, Benjamin Yong-Qiang
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2020-10-08
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
e116-e116
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092549829
Cited by
159
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 2
FWCI
13.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National University of Singapore
  • Universiti Malaya
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
  • National University Health System
  • Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, psychological well-being, depression, anxiety, stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, cross-national comparison, Asia-Pacific region, somatic symptoms, psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review