Cited by 35COVID-19 and Mental HealthPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealth and Conflict Studies

Mental health in Germany in the first weeks of the Russo-Ukrainian war

Open access
Gottschick, Cornelia, Diexer, Sophie, Massag, Janka, Klee, Bianca, Broda, Anja, Purschke, Oliver, Binder, Mascha, Sedding, Daniel +6 more·2023·BJPsych Open

Abstract

Background: In the connected world, although societies are not directly involved in a military conflict, they are exposed to media reports of violence. Aims: We assessed the effects of such exposures on mental health in Germany during the military conflict in Ukraine. Method: We used the German population-based cohort for digital health research, DigiHero, launching a survey on the eighth day of the Russo-Ukrainian war. Of the 27 509 cohort participants from the general population, 19 444 (70.7%) responded within 17 days. We measured mental health and fear of the impact of war compared with other fears (natural disasters or health-related). Results: In a subsample of 4441 participants assessed twice, anxiety in the population (measured by the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 screener) was higher in the first weeks of war than during the strongest COVID-19 restrictions. Anxiety was elevated across the whole age spectrum, and the mean was above the cut-off for mild anxiety. Over 95% of participants expressed various degrees of fear of the impact of war, whereas the percentage for other investigated fears was 0.47–0.82. A one-point difference in the fear of the impact of war was associated with a 2.5 point (95% CI 2.42–2.58) increase in anxiety (11.9% of the maximum anxiety score). For emotional distress, the increase was 0.67 points (0.66–0.68) (16.75% of the maximum score). Conclusions: The population in Germany reacted to the Russo-Ukrainian war with substantial distress, exceeding reactions during the strongest restrictions in the COVID-19 pandemic. Fear of the impact of war was associated with worse mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjo.2023.21

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • War-related uncertainty, particularly media-induced exposure to conflict, has significantly augmented levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress in Czech, Slovak, German, Polish, Italian, and even Taiwanese populations.

    “Recent research highlights that war-related uncertainty, particularly media-induced exposure to conflict, has significantly augmented levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress in Czech, Slovak, German, Polish, Italian, and even Taiwanese populations [55,81-83].”

    From Impact of Media-Induced Uncertainty on Mental Health: Narrative-Based Perspective. (2025) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Results report that, among participants in Germany, greater fear of the war’s impact was associated with higher anxiety, depressive symptoms, stress, and emotional distress. The Strengths and limitations section says media exposure was not measured, so the study does not establish a media-induced effect; it also does not report increased posttraumatic stress. The other countries in the multi-citation sentence are outside this paper’s study. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag, 2016 (https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottschick, C., Diexer, S., Massag, J., Klee, B., Broda, A., Purschke, O., Binder, M., Sedding, D., Frese, T., Girndt, M., Hoell, J. I., Michl, P., Gekle, M., & Mikolajczyk, R.
Affiliations
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Mikolajczyk, Rafael
Venue
BJPsych Open
Published
2023-04-14
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e66-e66
ISSN
2056-4724 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365479240
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJPsych Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
Russian invasion of Ukraine, mental health, anxiety, fear of war, emotional distress, COVID-19 restrictions, Germany

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review