The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet-based self-help for depression: randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Background: Major depression can be treated by means of cognitive–behavioural therapy but as skilled therapists are in short supply there is a need for self-help approaches. Many individuals with depression use the internet for discussion of symptoms and to share their experience. Aims: To investigate the effects of an internet-administered self-help programme including participation in a monitored, web-based discussion group, compared with participation in web-based discussion group only. Method: A randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of internet-based cognitive–behavioural therapy with minimal therapist contact (plus participation in a discussion group) with the effects of participation in a discussion group only. Results: Internet-based therapy with minimal therapist contact, combined with activity in a discussion group, resulted in greater reductions of depressive symptoms compared with activity in a discussion group only (waiting-list control group). At 6 months' follow-up, improvement was maintained to a large extent. Conclusions: Internet-delivered cognitive–behavioural therapy should be pursued further as a complement or treatment alternative for mild-to-moderate depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In studies targeting physical activity [33,34] or depression [45], the number of activities completed was not found to correlate with outcomes.”
From A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies (2011) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“The number of modules completed was found to correlate with outcomes in interventions that targeted cigarette smoking [42,46,47], depression [45,48-51], and anxiety disorders [52-57].”
From A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies (2011) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“analyses from our research team indicate that positive affect prospectively predicts lower risk of mortality (HR = .86, CI = .78–.96, p = .008) independent of the effect of negative affect [1].”
From An online positive affect skills intervention reduces depression in adults with type 2 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“Studies of clinical predictors of adherence have typically reported that baseline depression symptom severity is unrelated to adherence in online interventions (Andersson et al., 2005;Kenardy, McCafferty, & Rosa, 2003;Warmerdam et al., 2008).”
From Predictors of adherence and outcome in internet-based cognitive behavior therapy delivered in a telephone counseling setting (2014) · cites this paper as Andersson et al., 2005
In the citing paper
“A number of other studies [28–30] have also included discussion groups delivered in the form of bulletin boards as part of an online intervention but have failed to include the groups as a unique research variable so have been unable to identify the impact of the group on the effectiveness of the intervention.”
In the citing paper
“Cognitive restructuring, a form of reappraisal, is one of the most common components in Web-based treatments for depression [24-27].”
From Efficacy of a web-based, crowdsourced peer-to-peer cognitive reappraisal platform for depression: Randomized controlled trial (2015) · cites this paper as [24]
In the citing paper
“An analysis of a number of previous studies of an online intervention for depression in the community and that have used a CBT protocol similar to the intervention in the current study have reported post-treatment effect sizes averaging 1.29, and follow-up effects averaging 1.42, based on samples ranging from 45 – 300 [39,42-48].”
In the citing paper
“efficacy (is the intervention successful when delivered under controlled conditions [7]) of Internet applications has now also been established for a number of health problems”
From Directions for the International Society for Research on Internet Interventions (ISRII) (2006) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties.
Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.893 · Cited by 14,407
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
The world health organization composite international diagnostic interview short-form (CIDI-SF)
Kessler, R. C., Andrews, G., Mroczek, D., Ustun, B., & Wittchen, H. (1998) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.47 · Cited by 2,242
Frisch, M. B., Cornell, J., Villanueva, M., & Retzlaff, P. J. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.92 · Cited by 1,075
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
Christensen, H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.ee · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“It is, however, interesting to compare our findings with the results of Proudfoot et al (2003), who used a stand-alone computer in a general practice setting, and Christensen et al (2004), who used an open web page, both finding promising results.”
Result(2001) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 915
Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy
Burns, D. D. (1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 815
Lewinsohn, P. M. (1986) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 472
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis
SPEK, V., CUIJPERS, P., NYKLÍČEK, I., RIPER, H., KEYZER, J., & POP, V. (2007) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706008944 · Cited by 1,586
“However, further analyses showed that one study (Andersson et al. 2005) could be regarded as an outlier.”
Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Richards, D., & Richardson, T. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004 · Cited by 1,442
“Some RCT studies reported their objective was to establish the ef-fi cacy of a computer-based, clinician-assisted, intervention for depression (Andersson et al., 2005; Perini, Titov, & Andrews, 2009; Ruwaard et al., 2009), others examined the ef fi cacy of unsupported computer-based interventions…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAndrews, G., Cuijpers, P., Craske, M. G., McEvoy, P., & Titov, N. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013196 · Cited by 1,311
Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis
Andersson, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2009) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070903318960 · Cited by 1,368
Self-citationBarak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008) · Journal of Technology in Human Services · doi:10.1080/15228830802094429 · Cited by 1,283
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersson, G., Bergström, J., Holländare, F., Carlbring, P., Kaldo, V., & Ekselius, L.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Andersson, Gerhard
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 456-461
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2044237404
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 25.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Akademiska Sjukhuset
- Uppsala Universitet
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- online self-help, major depressive disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, online forums, therapist contact, depressive symptoms, online therapy
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Care, Self-Help Groups, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
