Cited by 140Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

A randomized controlled trial of internet-based therapy in depression

Moritz, Steffen, Schilling, Lisa, Hauschildt, Marit, Schröder, Johanna, Treszl, András·2012·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Depression is among the most prevalent disorders worldwide. In view of numerous treatment barriers, internet-based interventions are increasingly adopted to "treat the untreated". The present trial (registered as NCT01401296) was conducted over the internet and aimed to assess the efficacy of an online self-help program for depression (Deprexis). In random order, participants with elevated depression symptoms received program access or were allocated to a wait-list control condition. After eight weeks, participants were invited to take part in an online re-assessment. To compensate for common problems of online studies, such as low completion rates and unclear diagnostic status, reminders and incentives were used, and clinical diagnoses were externally confirmed in a subgroup of 29% of participants. Relative to the wait-list group, program users experienced significant symptom decline on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; primary outcome), the Dysfunctional Attitudes Scale (DAS), the Quality of Life scale (WHOQOL-BREF) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Compared to wait-list participants, symptom decline was especially pronounced among those with moderate symptoms at baseline as well as those not currently consulting a therapist. Completion (82%) and re-test reliability of the instruments (r = .72-.87) were good. The results of this trial suggest that online treatment can be beneficial for people with depression, particularly for those with moderate symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.006

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moritz, S., Schilling, L., Hauschildt, M., Schröder, J., & Treszl, A.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Moritz, Steffen
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
50
Issue
7-8
Pages
513-521
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2058124168
Cited by
140
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
online therapy, depression, online self-help program, Deprexis, waitlist control, barriers to treatment, treatment completion, dysfunctional attitudes, quality of life, self-esteem, Beck Depression Inventory, Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, WHOQOL-BREF, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review