Cited by 47Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

Duration of Antidepressant Drug Treatment and Its Influence on Risk of Relapse/Recurrence: Immortal and Neglected Time Bias

Gardarsdottir, H., Egberts, T. C., Stolker, J. J., Heerdink, E. R.·2009·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Several observational studies have found a higher risk of recurrence/relapse of depression for patients who discontinue antidepressant use compared with those who continue. This study demonstrated that measurement of follow-up time can be subject to immortal and neglected time bias. Data were obtained from the 2001 Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. The study population was composed of antidepressant users with a registered depression diagnosis, divided into early discontinuers and continuing users. Two methods were used to measure time to relapse/recurrence. Method 1, used in previously mentioned studies, measured the beginning of follow-up 6 months after starting antidepressant therapy. Method 2 constructed individual treatment episodes for each patient and measured follow-up from actual end-of-treatment episode. The Cox proportional hazards model produced a risk ratio of 1.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.02, 2.45) for method 1, suggesting a higher risk of relapse/recurrence for early discontinuers. In method 2, a statistically nonsignificant risk ratio of 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.49, 1.21) was produced, indicating no difference in risk of relapse/recurrence. The authors found the method used in previous studies subject to bias. Applying a different method, accounting for immortal and neglected time bias, eliminated the protective effects of longer treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwp142

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardarsdottir, H., Egberts, T. C., Stolker, J. J., & Heerdink, E. R.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Heerdink, E. R.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2009-06-04
Volume
170
Issue
3
Pages
280-285
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2159553172
Cited by
47
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Utrecht
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
antidepressant treatment duration, depression relapse, depression recurrence, antidepressant discontinuation, immortal time bias, treatment episodes, general practice patients
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Research Design, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Bias, Confidence Intervals, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Pharmacoepidemiology, Medication Adherence, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review