Cited by 82Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMental Health Research TopicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The replicability of ICD-11 complex post-traumatic stress disorder symptom networks in adults

Open access
Knefel, Matthias, Karatzias, Thanos, Ben-Ezra, Menachem, Cloitre, Marylene, Lueger-Schuster, Brigitte, Maercker, Andreas·2019·The British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The ICD-11 includes a new disorder, complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). A network approach to CPTSD will enable investigation of the structure of the disorder at the symptom level, which may inform the development of treatments that target specific symptoms to accelerate clinical outcomes. Aims: We aimed to test whether similar networks of ICD-11 CPTSD replicate across culturally different samples and to investigate possible differences, using a network analysis. Method: We investigated the network models of four nationally representative, community-based cross-sectional samples drawn from Germany, Israel, the UK, and the USA (total N= 6417). CPTSD symptoms were assessed with the International Trauma Questionnaire in all samples. Only those participants who reported significant functional impairment by CPTSD symptoms were included (N= 1591 included in analysis; mean age 43.55 years, s.d. 15.10, range 14–99, 67.7% women). Regularised partial correlation networks were estimated for each sample and the resulting networks were compared. Results: Despite differences in traumatic experiences, symptom severity and symptom profiles, the networks were very similar across the four countries. The symptoms within dimensions were strongly associated with each other in all networks, except for the two symptom indicators assessing aspects of affective dysregulation. The most central symptoms were ‘feelings of worthlessness’ and ‘exaggerated startle response’. Conclusions: The structure of CPTSD symptoms appears very similar across countries. Addressing symptoms with the strongest associations in the network, such as negative self-worth and startle reactivity, will likely result in rapid treatment response. Declaration of interest: A.M. and M.C. were members of the World Health Organization (WHO) ICD-11 Working Group on the Classification of Disorders Specifically Associated with Stress, reporting to the WHO International Advisory Group for the Revision of ICD-10 Mental and Behavioural Disorders. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official policies or positions of the International Advisory Group or the WHO.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.2018.286

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McNally RJ, Robinaugh DJ, Wu GWY, Wang L, Deserno MK, Borsboom D. Mental disorders as causal systems. Clin Psychol Sci 2015; 3(6): 836-49.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knefel, M., Karatzias, T., Ben-Ezra, M., Cloitre, M., Lueger-Schuster, B., & Maercker, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • NHS Lothian (GB)
Corresponding author
Knefel, Matthias
Venue
The British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2019-01-09
Volume
214
Issue
06
Pages
361-368
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2909988749
Cited by
82
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7
FWCI
11.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ariel University (RA1700000037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
complex PTSD, ICD-11, symptom networks, cross-cultural replication, emotional dysregulation, feelings of worthlessness, symptom centrality, International Trauma Questionnaire, functional disability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Germany, United Kingdom, Humans, Israel, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Reproducibility of Results, International Classification of Diseases, Young Adult, Symptom Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review