Cited by 103Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentYouth, Drugs, and Violence

Psychiatric and psychosocial predictors of substance use disorders among adolescents: Longitudinal study

Open access
Gau, Susan S. F., Chong, Mian-Yoon, Yang, Pincheng, Yen, Cheng-Fang, Liang, Kung-Yee, Cheng, Andrew T. A.·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Few studies have prospectively examined psychosocial and psychiatric predictors of adolescent substance use disorders simultaneously. Aims: To identify psychosocial and psychiatric predictors of substance use disorders in adolescence. Method: School children aged 12 years (s. d. =0. 3) free from any substance use disorder at grade7(n=428) were assessed in three consecutive years, using a standardised psychiatric interview. Their baseline psychosocial information was also collected. The outcome was the onset age of a substance use disorder. The Cox regression model was used for data analysis. Results: The most significant predictive factors for adolescent substance use disorder included male gender, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder and sibling use of tobacco. Three protective factors against such morbidity included living in a household with two parents, a good academic grade at grade 7 and objection to the use of substances. Conclusions: Early intervention for disruptive behaviour disorders and specific psychosocial risk factors might prevent substance use disorders in early adolescence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.022871

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another study found a decreased risk compared with controls in those with childhood anxiety disorders.

    “and another study found a decreased risk compared with controls in those with childhood anxiety disorders.8”

    From Childhood Psychiatric Disorders as Risk Factor for Subsequent Substance Abuse: A Meta-Analysis. (2017) · cites this paper as [8]

    Table 3 (page not provided) reports a lower estimated risk of substance use disorder for adolescents with anxiety disorder than for those without it (hazard ratio 0.69 versus 1.00). But the 95% confidence interval (0.29–1.65) includes 1, and the Psychiatric predictors section says anxiety disorders did not significantly predict substance use disorder. The claim omits that uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study found the highest risk for substance-related disorders in childhood externalizing disorders.

    “One study found the highest risk for substance-related disorders in childhood externalizing disorders, 8”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [2]2. Achenbach, T. M. (1991) Manual for the Cross-informant Manual for the Cross-informant Program for the CBCL/4 -18, YSR and TRF Program for the CBCL/4 -18, YSR and TRF. Department of . Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont. Psychiatry, University of Vermont. 4 7 4 7 https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.106.022871 Published online by Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gau, S. S. F., Chong, M.-Y., Yang, P., Yen, C.-F., Liang, K.-Y., & Cheng, A. T. A.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica (TW)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Andrew T. A.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-01
Volume
190
Issue
1
Pages
42-48
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2147653143
Cited by
103
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Youth, Drugs, and Violence
Keywords
adolescent substance use disorders, psychosocial risk factors, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, academic performance, gender differences, age of onset, early intervention, disruptive behavior disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Taiwan, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review