Cited by 158Schizophrenia research and treatmentBone health and osteoporosis researchPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies

Risk of hip fracture in patients with a history of schizophrenia

Open access
Howard, Louise, Kirkwood, Graham, Leese, Morven·2007·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: There is evidence of an association between decreased bone mineral density schizophrenia, and prolactin-raising antipsychotic medication. However, it is not known whether this is clinically significant. Aims: To investigate whether patients with a history of schizophrenia are at increased risk of hip fracture. Method: In a case-control study, we compared cases of ‘hip fracture’ on the General Practice Research Database (n=16 341) with matched controls (n=29 889). Results: Hip fracture was associated with schizophrenia (OR=1.73; 95% CI 1.32-2.28), and prolactin-raising antipsychotics (OR=2.6; 95% CI 2.432.78), in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, prolactin-raising antipsychotics were independently associated with hip fracture but schizophrenia was not. A significant interaction between gender and antipsychotics was found in the association with hip fracture (P=0.042); OR=2.12 (95% C11.73-2.59)for men, OR=l.93 (95% C11.78-2.10) for women. Conclusions: The association between prolactin-raising antipsychotic medication and hip fracture may have serious implications for public health. Mental health service patients may require preventive measures including dietary and lifestyle advice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.023671

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howard, L., Kirkwood, G., & Leese, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Howard, Louise
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2007-02
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
129-134
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2166620991
Cited by
158
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Keywords
hip fracture, schizophrenia, bone mineral density, fracture risk, sex differences, fracture prevention, psychiatric patients
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Female, Hip Fractures, Humans, Male, Prolactin, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Bone Density, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review