Cited by 71Treatment of Major DepressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Morphometric analysis of neuronal and glial cell pathology in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in late-life depression

Open access
Khundakar, Ahmad, Morris, Christopher, Oakley, Arthur, McMeekin, William, Thomas, Alan J.·2009·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Late-life depression has been associated with cerebrovascular disease and especially with ischaemic white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging and morphometric studies have identified abnormalities in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Aims: To examine glial and neuronal density and neuronal volume in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in late-life major depression. Method: We used the disector and nucleator methods to estimate neuronal density and volume and glial density of cells in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in a post-mortem study of 17 individuals with late-life major depression and 10 age-matched controls. Results: We found a reduction in the volume of pyramidal neurones in the whole cortex, which was also present in layer 3 and more markedly in layer 5. There were no comparable changes in non-pyramidal neurones and no glial differences. Conclusions: Overall, we found a decrease in pyramidal neuronal size in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in late-life depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.052688

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The enhanced susceptibility of medial prefrontal cortex layer V neurons likely resulted from the relatively greater neuroanatomic distances neuronal projections must traverse to subcortical areas.

    “This likely resulted from the relatively greater neuroanatomic distances neuronal projections must traverse to subcortical areas. 34”

    From High vulnerability of medial prefrontal pyramidal neurons in post-stroke, vascular, Alzheimer's disease, and aging-related dementias (2026) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion says layer 5 neurons in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex project to the caudate and may be vulnerable to ischaemic damage as their axons traverse white matter; the Results report a more pronounced layer 5 change. The paper does not study the medial prefrontal cortex or attribute vulnerability specifically to greater projection distance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with depression and related mental illnesses have lower BDNF and/or TRKB mRNA levels, reduced cortical neuron size, lower synaptic protein levels, decreased mTOR signaling, and fewer dendritic spines/synapses in the PFC.

    “Postmortem studies have demonstrated that patients with depression and related mental illnesses have lower BDNF and/or TRKB mRNA levels (75–77), reduced cortical neuron size (75, 78, 79), lower synaptic protein levels (80), decreased mTOR signaling (81), and fewer dendritic spines/synapses (82, 83) in the PFC.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baldwin R. Depressive disorders. In Oxford Textbook of Old Aga Psychiatry (eds R Jacoby, C Oppenheimer, T Dening, et al): 529-56. Oxford University Press, 2008.
  2. Kaufer DI, Lewis DA. Frontal lobe anatomy and cortical connectivity. In The Human Frontal Lobes (eds BL Miller, JL Cumming): 27-44. Guilford Press, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khundakar, A., Morris, C., Oakley, A., McMeekin, W., & Thomas, A. J.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Thomas, Alan J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-08
Volume
195
Issue
2
Pages
163-169
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2172113254
Cited by
71
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Medical Research Council (G0400074, G0900652)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
geriatric depression, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, neuronal density, glial density, neuronal volume, pyramidal neurons, white matter hyperintensities, cerebrovascular disease, postmortem brain
MeSH terms
Aged, Autopsy, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuroglia, Neurons, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review