Cited by 97Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Cannabis and suicide: Longitudinal study

Open access
Price, Ceri, Hemmingsson, Tomas, Lewis, Glyn, Zammit, Stanley, Allebeck, Peter·2009·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Some studies suggest that cannabis use is associated with suicidal ideation, but no detailed longitudinal study has examined suicide as an outcome. AIMS: To examine the association between cannabis use and completed suicide. METHOD: A longitudinal study investigated 50 087 men conscripted for Swedish military service, with cannabis use measured non-anonymously at conscription. Suicides during 33 years of follow-up were identified by linkage with the National Cause of Death Register. RESULTS: There were 600 (1.2% of cohort) suicides or deaths from undetermined causes. Cannabis use was associated with an increased risk of suicide (crude OR for 'ever use' 1.62, 95% CI 1.28-2.07), but this association was eliminated after adjustment for confounding (adjusted OR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.65-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a strong association between cannabis use and suicide, this was explained by markers of psychological and behavioural problems. These results suggest that cannabis use is unlikely to have a strong effect on risk of completed suicide, either directly or as a consequence of mental health problems secondary to its use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.065227

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is some evidence of specificity of outcome for cannabis and psychosis, though this is not seen in all studies.

    “There is also some evidence of specificity of outcome (10,56) though this is not seen in all studies (57).”

    From Association Between Cannabis and Psychosis: Epidemiologic Evidence (2016) · cites this paper as [56]

    Citation 57 is attached to the qualification that specificity of outcome is not seen in all studies. The Discussion says the opposite for this cohort: adjustment eliminated the cannabis–suicide association but did not eliminate the cannabis–schizophrenia association. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Angst J, Baumann U, Muller U, Ruppen R. [Epidemiology of drug consumption in the canton of Zurich. Inquiry in a group of 6315 young men and 1381 young women all aged 19]. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr 1973; 217: 11-24.
  2. Andreasson S, Allebeck P. Cannabis and mortality among young men: a longitudinal study of Swedish conscripts. Scand J Soc Med 1990; 18: 9-15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, C., Hemmingsson, T., Lewis, G., Zammit, S., & Allebeck, P.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Zammit, Stanley
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2009-12
Volume
195
Issue
6
Pages
492-497
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2102717712
Cited by
97
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cannabis use, suicide, suicide mortality, suicidal ideation, conscripts, mental illness, behavioral problems, cannabis and mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Marijuana Abuse, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Military Personnel, Risk Factors, Suicide, Sweden, Odds Ratio, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review