Cited by 281Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Self-reported cannabis use characteristics, patterns and helpfulness among medical cannabis users

Bonn-Miller, Marcel O., Boden, Matthew Tyler, Bucossi, Meggan M., Babson, Kimberly A.·2014·The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Little research has investigated the demographic and symptom profile of medical cannabis users in states in the USA that have legalized cannabis use. METHODS: In the present cross-sectional study, we investigated the demographic profile of 217 adults currently receiving medical cannabis, as well as differences in problematic use and perceived helpfulness in terms of (i) symptoms of psychological disorders and pain, and (ii) motives for use. RESULTS: Findings indicated that medical cannabis users (i) use and perceive cannabis to be beneficial for multiple conditions, some for which cannabis is not specifically prescribed or allowed at the state level; and (ii) report similar rates of disordered use as compared with population estimates among regular users. Furthermore, problematic cannabis use was predicted by several symptoms of psychological disorders (e.g. depression) and a variety of use motives (e.g. coping), while cannabis was reported as particularly helpful among those with several psychological symptoms (e.g. traumatic intrusions), as well as those reporting use for social anxiety reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Results are discussed in terms of future directions for research given the current debates regarding legalization of cannabis for medical purposes and, more generally, the lack of empirical data to inform such debates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/00952990.2013.821477

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonn-Miller, M. O., Boden, M. T., Bucossi, M. M., & Babson, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Center of Excellence for Substance Abuse Treatment and Education, Philadelphia VA Medical Center Philadelphia, PAUSA
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Published
2013-11-08
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
23-30
ISSN
  • 0095-2990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-9891
OpenAlex
W2029383553
Cited by
281
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
medical cannabis, cannabis use patterns, problematic cannabis use, psychological symptoms, pain, use motives, coping, depression, social anxiety, cannabis legalization
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, California, Marijuana Abuse, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Marijuana Smoking, Middle Aged, Motivation, Pain, Self Report, Medical Marijuana

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review