Cited by 86Face Recognition and PerceptionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Recognition of disgusted facial expressions in severe depression

Open access
Douglas, Katie M., Porter, Richard J.·2010·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Summary: Facial emotion processing was examined in patients with severe depression (n = 68) and a healthy control group (n = 50), using the Facial Expression Recognition Task. A negative interpretation bias was observed in the depression group: neutral faces were more likely to be interpreted as sad and less likely to be interpreted as happy, compared with controls. The depression group also displayed a specific deficit in the recognition of facial expressions of disgust, compared with controls. This may relate to impaired functioning of frontostriatal structures, particularly the basal ganglia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.078113

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of patients with bipolar disorder in a depressed phase reveal a mood-congruent bias in emotion perception tasks, including difficulty labelling happy faces and a tendency to misinterpret neutral facial stimuli as sad and happy faces as angry.

    “studies examining patients with bipolar disorder in a depressed phase of illness reveal a mood congruent bias in emotion perception tasks, including difficulties labelling happy faces 97,102 and a tendency to misinterpret neutral facial stimuli as sad 144,183 and happy faces as angry.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders -Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0, 8/98 revision). New York State Psychiatric Institute, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Douglas, K. M., & Porter, R. J.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Porter, Richard J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-08
Volume
197
Issue
2
Pages
156-157
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2135090800
Cited by
86
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tertiary Education Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
severe depression, facial expression recognition, disgust, emotional face processing, negative interpretation bias, sadness, happiness, frontostriatal dysfunction, basal ganglia
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Male, Case-Control Studies, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review