Cited by 260Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research Topics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical staging in psychiatry: a cross-cutting model of diagnosis with heuristic and practical value

Open access
Scott, Jan, Leboyer, Marion, Hickie, Ian, Berk, Michael, Kapczinski, Flavio, Frank, Ellen, Kupfer, David, McGorry, Patrick·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Staging models are used routinely in general medicine for potentially serious or chronic physical disorders such as diabetes, arthritis and cancers, describing the links between biomarkers, clinical phenotypes and disease extension, and promoting a personalised or stratified medicine approach to treatment planning. Clinical staging involves a detailed description of where an individual exists on a continuum of disorder progression from stage 0 (an at-risk or latency stage) through to stage IV (late or end-stage disease). The approach is popular owing to its clinical utility and is increasingly being applied in psychiatry. The concept offers an informed approach to research and the active promotion of indicated prevention and early intervention strategies. We suggest that for young persons with emerging bipolar disorder, such transdiagnostic staging models could provide a framework that better reflects the developmental psychopathology and matches the complex longitudinal inter-relationships between subsyndromal and syndromal mood, psychotic and other disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.110858

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–260 of 260

Metadata

Authors
Scott, J., Leboyer, M., Hickie, I., Berk, M., Kapczinski, F., Frank, E., Kupfer, D., & McGorry, P.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Scott, Jan
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-04
Volume
202
Issue
4
Pages
243-245
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2122348552
Cited by
260
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fondation FondaMental
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
clinical staging, developmental psychopathology, psychosis, early intervention, prevention, stratified medicine
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Humans, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review