Cited by 65Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and Access

Age differences in treatment response to a collaborative care intervention for anxiety disorders

Open access
Wetherell, Julie Loebach, Petkus, Andrew J., Thorp, Steven R., Stein, Murray B., Chavira, Denise A., Campbell-Sills, Laura, Craske, Michelle G., Sherbourne, Cathy +3 more·2013·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Some data suggest that older adults with anxiety disorders do not respond as well to treatment as do younger adults. Aims: We examined age differences in outcomes from the Coordinated Anxiety Learning and Management (CALM) study, an effectiveness trial comparing usual care to a computer-assisted collaborative care intervention for primary care patients with panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and/or social anxiety disorder. This is the first study to examine the efficacy of a collaborative care intervention in a sample that included both younger and older adults with anxiety disorders. We hypothesised that older adults would show a poorer response to the intervention than younger adults. Method: We examined findings for the overall sample, as well as within each diagnostic category (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00347269). Results: The CALM intervention was more effective than usual care among younger adults overall and for those with generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder and social anxiety disorder. Among older adults, the intervention was effective overall and for those with social anxiety disorder and PTSD but not for those with panic disorder or generalised anxiety disorder. The effects of the intervention also appeared to erode by the 18-month follow-up, and there were no significant effects on remission among the older adults. Conclusions: These results are consistent with the findings of other investigators suggesting that medications and psychotherapy for anxiety disorders may not be as effective for older individuals as they are for younger people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118547

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Derogatis LR BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory: administration, scoring, and procedures manual Minneapolis (MN) NCS Pearson, Inc 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wetherell, J. L., Petkus, A. J., Thorp, S. R., Stein, M. B., Chavira, D. A., Campbell-Sills, L., Craske, M. G., Sherbourne, C., Bystritsky, A., Sullivan, G., & Roy-Byrne, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • California State University, San Marcos (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Wetherell, Julie Loebach
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-07
Volume
203
Issue
1
Pages
65-72
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2155162860
Cited by
65
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (and K24)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH057835, MH065324, MH-64122, K24MH065324, K24MH064122, MH058915, K24MH64122, MH057858, U01MH070022, U01MH070018, U01MH057858, MH070022, U01MH058915)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
age differences, collaborative care, anxiety disorders, older adults, computer-based intervention, primary care, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder, treatment response, remission
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review