The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Predictive validity of the Trauma Screening Questionnaire in detecting post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with psychotic disorders
Open accessAbstract
Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in patients with a psychotic disorder. Because a PTSD diagnosis is often missed in patients with psychosis in routine care, a valid screening instrument could be helpful. Aims: To determine the validity of the Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) as a screening tool for PTSD among individuals with psychotic disorders. Method: Among 2608 patients with a psychotic disorder, the rate of trauma exposure was determined and the TSQ was administered to screen for PTSD. PTSD status was verified in 455 patients using the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (trial registration: ISRCTN 79584912). Results: Trauma exposure was reported by 78.2% of the 2608 patients. PTSD prevalence was estimated at 16% (95% CI 14.6–17.4%) compared with 0.5% reported in the patients' clinical charts. A TSQ cut-off score of six predicted PTSD with 78.8% sensitivity, 75.6% specificity, 44.5% correct positives and 93.6% correct negatives. Conclusions: The TSQ seems to be a valid screening tool for PTSD in patients with a psychotic disorder.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Research of de Bont et al. (19) indicates an estimated under-report of PTSD of as much as 96,9% in clinical practice.”
From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as de Bont et al. (19)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., & Keane, T. M. (1995) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490080106 · Cited by 5,024
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Sheehan, K. H., Janavs, J., & Dunbar, G. (1997) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(97)83296-8 · Cited by 3,513
Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Dancu, C. V., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1993) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490060405 · Cited by 2,537
Varese, F., Smeets, F., Drukker, M., Lieverse, R., Lataster, T., Viechtbauer, W., Read, J., van Os, J., & Bentall, R. P. (2012) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbs050 · Cited by 2,436
Sheehan, D., Lecrubier, Y., Harnett Sheehan, K., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Keskiner, A., Schinka, J., Knapp, E., Sheehan, M., & Dunbar, G. (1997) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(97)83297-x · Cited by 2,149
Clinician-administered PTSD scale: A review of the first ten years of research
Weathers, F. W., Keane, T. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.1029 · Cited by 1,903
Read, J., van Os, J., Morrison, A. P., & Ross, C. A. (2005) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2005.00634.x · Cited by 1,534
Gender differences in posttraumatic stress disorder.
Olff, M., Langeland, W., Draijer, N., & Gersons, B. P. R. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.183 · Cited by 1,058
Sexual Revictimization: A Review of the Empirical Literature
Classen, C. C., Palesh, O. G., & Aggarwal, R. (2005) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838005275087 · Cited by 813
A survey of psychologists’ attitudes towards and utilization of exposure therapy for PTSD
Becker, C. B., Zayfert, C., & Anderson, E. (2004) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00138-4 · Cited by 759
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Van Vliet, 2007, Het Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Een kort gestructureerd diagnostisch psychiatrisch interview voor DSM-IV- en ICD-10-stoornissen [The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. A brief structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10 psychiatric disorders.], Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 49
- 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th edn, revised) (DSM-IV-TR).
- 10.1017/S0007125000161896 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD
Brewin, C. R., Cloitre, M., Hyland, P., Shevlin, M., Maercker, A., Bryant, R. A., Humayun, A., Jones, L. M., Kagee, A., Rousseau, C., et al. (2017) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001 · Cited by 678
Hardy, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00697 · Cited by 224
Hardy, A., Emsley, R., Freeman, D. H., Bebbington, P., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Dunn, G., & Fowler, D. G. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv175 · Cited by 181
van den Berg, D. P. G., de Bont, P. A. J. M., van der Vleugel, B. M., de Roos, C., de Jongh, A., van Minnen, A., & van der Gaag, M. (2016) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv172 · Cited by 153
de Bont, P. A. J. M., van den Berg, D. P. G., van der Vleugel, B. M., de Roos, C., de Jongh, A., van der Gaag, M., & van Minnen, A. M. (2016) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291716001094 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- de Bont, P. A. J. M., van den Berg, D. P. G., van der Vleugel, B. M., de Roos, C., de Jongh, A., van der Gaag, M., & van Minnen, A.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- de Bont, Paul A. J. M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Royal College of Psychiatrists
- Published
- 2015-05
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 408-416
- ISSN
- 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2119539464
- Cited by
- 133
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Stichting tot Steun Vereniging tot Christelijke Verzorging van Geestes- en Zenuwzieken
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, PTSD screening, predictive validity, trauma exposure, PTSD prevalence, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
