Cited by 95Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Predicting post-traumatic stress disorder: validation of the Trauma Screening Questionnaire in victims of assault

WALTERS, JAMES T. R., BISSON, JONATHAN I., SHEPHERD, JONATHAN P.·2007·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. No accurate means of determining which individuals will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following a traumatic event has yet been identified. This study aimed to determine the validity of the Trauma Screening Questionnaire (TSQ) in predicting the development of PTSD following assault. Method. Five hundred and sixty-two individuals who presented to an emergency unit following assault completed the TSQ between 1 and 3 weeks later. The Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) was completed by the same individuals at 1 month and 6 months following assault to determine the presence of PTSD. The predictive power of the TSQ was determined by statistical tests. Results. The TSQ was an effective means of predicting future PTSD, with a sensitivity of 0·85, specificity 0·89, negative predictive value (NPV) 0·98 and efficiency 0·90. The positive predictive value (PPV) was lower (0·48), probably as a result of the relatively low prevalence of PTSD at 1 month (11%) and 6 months (8%) following the assault. Conclusions. This study suggests that the TSQ can be used between 1 and 3 weeks after assault to help identify individuals who will develop PTSD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291706008658

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothbaum, B. O. & Foa, E. B. (1992). Subtypes of posttraumatic stress disorder and duration of symptoms. In Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: DSM-IV and Beyond (ed. J. R. T. Davidson and E. B. Foa), pp. 23–35. American Psychiatric Press: Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WALTERS, J. T. R., BISSON, J. I., & SHEPHERD, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Wales (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-09-07
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
143-150
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2054442538
Cited by
95
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, assault victims, PTSD prediction, screening tool validation, Davidson Trauma Scale, sensitivity and specificity, emergency department patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review