Cited by 623Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder

Open access
Brewin, Chris R., Rose, Suzanna, Andrews, Bernice, Green, John, Tata, Philip, McEvedy, Chris, Turner, Stuart, Foa, Edna B.·2002·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Brief screening instruments appear to be a viable way of detecting post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but none has yet been adequately validated. Aims: To test and cross-validate a brief instrumentthat is simple to administer and score. Method: Forty-one survivors of a rai l crash were administered a questionnaire, followed by a structured clinical interview 1 week later. Results: Excellent prediction of a PTSD diagnosis was provided by respondents endorsing at least six re-experiencing or arousal symptoms, in any combination. The findings were replicated on data from a previous study of 157 crime victims. Conclusions: Performance of the new measure was equivalent to agreement achieved between two full clinical interviews.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.181.2.158

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1017/S0033291799008624 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0165-1781(99)00070-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490060405 · DOI · Paper page
  4. First, 1996, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders
  5. 10.1017/S0033291796004229 · DOI
  6. Brewin, 2002, Reconstructing Early Intervention After Trauma
  7. 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  8. 10.1080/080394800427519 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0005-7967(96)00033-2 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Başoğlu, 2001, A study of the validity of a screening instrument for traumatic stress in earthquake survivors in Turkey, Journal of Traumatic Stress, 14, 491, 10.1023/A:1011156505957 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/jts.2490080106 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  13. Brewin, 1999, Acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of violent crime, American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 360, 10.1176/ajp.156.3.360 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/jama.282.8.755 · DOI
  15. Brewin, 2001, Cognitive and emotional reactions to traumatic events: implications for short-term intervention, Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 17, 163

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brewin, C. R., Rose, S., Andrews, B., Green, J., Tata, P., McEvedy, C., Turner, S., & Foa, E. B.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Brewin, Chris R.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2002-08
Volume
181
Issue
2
Pages
158-162
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W9204884
Cited by
623
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, screening tool, re-experiencing symptoms, arousal symptoms, crime victims
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adult, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, London, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Railroads, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review